You are arguing for the removal of protections against dishonest arguments.
Really my entire argument is against censorship of honest (dissenting) arguments. If you think otherwise, I suggest you really haven't understood what I've said. In the previous post, when you were talking about hypothetical "subversive agents that are hard to catch" I was arguing for letting the community weed them out and learn from the engagement with them. That is not arguing for "removal of protections," so much as having a safe space to learn how to protect ourselves; an essential lesson to learn for the GA.
You seem to be suggesting that we "err on the side of caution" (where people with honest, but dissenting views will be caught in the crossfire). More important perhaps, you are suggesting that we must have overlords that "err on the side of caution" to protect us from our lack of critical thinking skills. I suggest nothing could be more harmful for the GA, or the individual. All paths to the most extreme fuckery lie on the road of Censorship sold under the banner of "For Your Own Good."
I suggest you may not understand "the established knowledge" in that document (nor what that phrase really means).
I will never stop arguing against censorship of ideas engaged in earnest. I think that makes me smart (in the "aware" sense). YMMV.
Really my entire argument is against censorship of honest (dissenting) arguments. If you think otherwise, I suggest you really haven't understood what I've said. In the previous post, when you were talking about hypothetical "subversive agents that are hard to catch" I was arguing for letting the community weed them out and learn from the engagement with them. That is not arguing for "removal of protections," so much as having a safe space to learn how to protect ourselves; an essential lesson to learn for the GA.
You seem to be suggesting that we "err on the side of caution" (where people with honest, but dissenting views will be caught in the crossfire). More important perhaps, you are suggesting that we must have overlords that "err on the side of caution" to protect us from our lack of critical thinking skills. I suggest nothing could be more harmful for the GA, or the individual. All paths to the most extreme fuckery lie on the road of Censorship sold under the banner of "For Your Own Good."