"Access to the CommsD board is evidence that the post is Q"
Take your pick I guess, but...
If a compromised entity wanted to create confusion, you think they wouldn't post this? "The board is compromised. I am the real Q."
48 hour rule.
If the board was compromised, and the return of Q on 24/6 was fake, then this means that Black Hats (or miscreants) forced the re-emergence of Q. I find that less easy to believe than the idea that someone posting WITHOUT Q's tripcode and via TOR is trying to generate confusion.
Either way, I reserve judgment at this point, and I think any wise anon would. By all means, post the factual data but be careful about drawing specific conclusions, imo.
Er, who?
"Tripcodes are evidence the post is Q"
"Deltas are evidence the post is Q"
"Access to the CommsD board is evidence that the post is Q"
Take your pick I guess, but...
If a compromised entity wanted to create confusion, you think they wouldn't post this? "The board is compromised. I am the real Q."
48 hour rule.
If the board was compromised, and the return of Q on 24/6 was fake, then this means that Black Hats (or miscreants) forced the re-emergence of Q. I find that less easy to believe than the idea that someone posting WITHOUT Q's tripcode and via TOR is trying to generate confusion.
Either way, I reserve judgment at this point, and I think any wise anon would. By all means, post the factual data but be careful about drawing specific conclusions, imo.
this q talks like a fag and his shits all retarded