If youve been reading Q since Oct 2017, you know what I mean
Edit to clarify--what I mean is there is a Q way of speaking and this lacks it.
Ok eg this stood out immediately: Use your logic
Tell me why this is not Q like
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
Comments (253)
sorted by:
In the beginning, before Trump won in 2016, I started following a guy named Scott Adams, the creator of the Dilbert cartoons. He has his own issues, but what I gained from listening to him is that he's a professionally trained hypnotist who was an expert in various persuasion techniques.
He began breaking down Trump's speeches, tweets, interviews etc. and explained the persuasion power behind Trump's public interactions.
Scott Adams is highly against Q, and treats it like its far worse than BLM. But he considered Trump to be a master of persuasion. I think Trump's persona, which certainly can rub some people the wrong way, is highly calculated. His repetition and dumbed-down vocabulary serve a purpose. You can watch older videos of Trump where he is far more fluent and uses higher word choices. Knowing what to look for, I see the strategies, the pace-and-lead, the Sun Tzu (he even named his book similar to the Art of War).
"Denies the existence of problems he can't solve, happily taking credit for the solution" ... reads like you think he's a bumbling idiot with no strategy who just inexplicably stumbled into being elected president.
Trump was highly against vaccinations in the past. He knows his base better than anyone, and fully realizes how much we loathe forced vaccinations. He knows better than anyone how covid has completely destroyed our economy.
Why did he push it? I don't know for certain, but the "turn the sub into the torpedo to disarm it" sounds plausible to me. Medical tyranny is a worldwide coordinated phenomenon (implying there is a coordinating cabal and it not just being 10's of 1000's of individual criminals). If it was going to happen anyway, perhaps the best strategy was to have it happen under his oversight so there's a limit to how destructive it could be.
You're framing Hunter as the worst kind of drug addict who is so debilitated that he cannot function in society. I don't think that's accurate.
It's clear he was a high performing bagman for his father, who flew around the world collecting money on Joe's behalf for at least a decade. He wouldn't be capable of that if he were as bad as you framed him.
I think you already described what happens. " In the other direction, we're just waiting for believers to lose faith on their own accord. They weren't proven wrong. They just give up."
If Trump's 2nd term comes and goes and Hillary is never actually arrested or any other significant happenings in terms of justice with trafficking, I personally will simply focus more on the local level and ignore the more global problems that are apparently unfixable.
The only reason I continue is because your points are plausible. I don't deny they are possible, I just don't think they're probable. You don't strike me as a concern troll and I don't get offended at people who merely see things differently.
If you have any other questions I don't mind answering.
You can do the same thing with Biden, but Q people have a very different explanation as to the reason.
While I wouldn't word it quite that way, I haven't proven it's impossible that somebody who is unprepared and unqualified for the Presidency, but gifted in the power of persuasion and gifted with money, could technically survive a Presidency with a significant base of support. I would like to prove that this is impossible, because it's certainly less unsettling to believe it's impossible.
I don't like to dox myself, but I do have a significant amount of experience around drug addicts, and can safely say this is exactly how most drug addicts get caught.
As I stated a moment ago, I do not underestimate the capabilities of subpar people to exist at higher levels of society despite themselves, as long as they have resources and/or the right kinds of people looking out for them. There is no question that Hunter Biden likely had far more responsibility than he would have earned without his last name, and you won't bait me into defending him as a human being.
I can tell you that if the Storm arrives and Q turns out to be right all along, it will REQUIRE me to strongly reevaluate how I process evidence.
If I'm wrong about this, I need to ensure that I am smarter and not tricked again, because I am currently voting based on my beliefs. If I truly care about this country, which I believe I do, then Q's arrival would MORALLY COMPEL me to abandon my beliefs and reevaluate from the perspective of the people who were not wrong.
Because otherwise, I'm allowing the lie to continue to hurt people, through me. And if I'm proven wrong, then I have a responsibility to ensure I am not a vessel for liars.
I am hoping for the same commitment from Q people, but I understand that it's a BIG commitment. I make it readily and happily. It would be wrong for me to simply "focus on something else" if it turns out that my foundational beliefs about the world and how I interact with it are proven to be a lie.
I feel the same way, to be sure. As I've stated, there is nothing inherently impossible about the Q Plan, at least in any general way. I can acknowledge that there are probably instances in the multiverse where Trump and Friends did put such a Plan into action. I don't think it's true, but I also don't have any problem whatsoever testing my beliefs against yours.
Because at the end of the day, the absolute worst outcome for me is being proven wrong, which results in me getting smarter. As well as having an interesting new set of political allies, many of whom I've now known for over a year. :)
And, if things go the other way, and Q's Plan never shows up, I also hope that some people from Q World might feel there's at least one person from the "other side" that isn't looking to rub their face in it.