Absolutely. But EPA does not do that. It weaponises regulatory powers to force people to do what they want. Like destroying mum and pop farmers by forcing them to cull their livestock, and much much more.
The point is, we dont need one size fits all where it concerns environment. Thats too much power to abuse.
If, say, one state is notorious for their pollution, then people will move out to other states where they do a better job. Or in a world without corrupt courts, you could easily sue companies that do pulltion. In fact thats the right way to deal with this, ensure those who are irresponsible pay the price for that, and automatically they will behave better.
I have absolutely no concern that getting rid of EPA will somehow convert American cities into new Dehli or Jakarta
Absolutely. But EPA does not do that. It weaponises regulatory powers to force people to do what they want. Like destroying mum and pop farmers by forcing them to cull their livestock, and much much more.
The point is, we dont need one size fits all where it concerns environment. Thats too much power to abuse.
If, say, one state is notorious for their pollution, then people will move out to other states where they do a better job. Or in a world without corrupt courts, you could easily sue companies that do pulltion. In fact thats the right way to deal with this, ensure those who are irresponsible pay the price for that, and automatically they will behave better.
I have absolutely no concern that getting rid of EPA will somehow convert American cities into new Dehli or Jakarta