Nah. I think that's a step backwards that would end in resentment. I'd stand by them as I don't think the state should ever enter the lives of private individuals unless they are fucking kids. State should not get involved with the private lives of others. As for the tax implications, I think it's a bit more complex. At the end of the day. How's it any of your business unless they want help with their homosexuality from you? (not having a go btw just in case it sounds like that). I find it to be a sin of morality and religion, not of law. It's like saying we should arrest folk for lying, gossiping or for attention seeking which are also wrong in Christianity. It just goes backwards into another big brother state, except this would be with extremely religious overtones.
Nah. I think that's a step backwards that would end in resentment. I'd stand by them as I don't think the state should ever enter the lives of private individuals unless they are fucking kids. State should not get involved with the private lives of others. As for the tax implications, I think it's a bit more complex. At the end of the day. How's it any of your business unless they want help with their homosexuality from you? (not having a go btw just in case it sounds like that). I find it to be a sin of morality and religion, not of law. It's like saying we should arrest folk for lying, gossiping or for attention seeking which are also wrong in Christianity. It just goes backwards into another big brother state, except this would be with extremely religious overtones.