u/dty6 u/lonewulf u/sleepydude

READ DECODE BLOG'S POST FIRST

https://decodingsymbols.wordpress.com/2022/06/30/mos-cia-compare-contrast/

(Very interesting post)

03/26/1979 Israel and Egypt Peace treaty in DC BEGINNING OF MASSIVE ISRAEL & Egypt FOREIGN AID

Three Mile Island = TMI = Too Much Information

Read to the bottom when he gets to decoding the new Q posts. Very interesting stuff.

Anyway, to get into the new posts note the discussion of Jane Roe, and abortions.

I decoded that in my last post as it relates to likely an ending to MK ops. Abortion symbolizing adults who have children they want to abort and then sell them to the 666 as sacrifices. Abortions is the tamest way to describe what happens there and understandable why it would be chosen as a symbol as it rolls off the tongue a lot better than child sacrifice to create murders.

No wonder we get articles like this:

https://www.yahoo.com/video/jane-roe-daughter-says-she-170307366.html

The daughter of the woman at the centre of Roe v Wade has said that she is “devastated” by the Supreme Court’s ruling which has now undone all her mother’s “hard work” and “sacrificing” that led to the legalisation of abortion in America five decades ago.

Note the air quotes around "sacrificing".

Texas was one of 13 states with a trigger law in place ready to go into place as soon as Roe was overturned.

https://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2021/mar/6/satanists-sue-for-religious-right-to-ritual-aborti/

“[On Feb. 23, 2021] The Satanic Temple [of Dallas, Fort Worth, and Houston] filed a lawsuit against the State of Texas alleging certain state-mandated abortion regulations violate the religious liberty of its members … [and] violate the temple’s religious teachings. The Satanic Temple … wants its followers to be exempt from such regulations. The temple has members across the country, including in Texas.”

Mr. Greaves goes further: “The ritual goes like this: Before the abortion takes place … a member of The Satanic Temple will look at her reflection, be reminded of her personhood and responsibility to herself, take deep breaths, focus on her intent and make herself comfortable. When ready, she will say the third and fifth tenet of the temple aloud.”

Read Q post #4552

Why would [D]s block a bill that stops infanticide [allow ABORTIONs up to point of birth] and does not provide new restrictions on ABORTION itself? How is taxpayer funded [PP] allowed to donate [large sums] of taxpayer funds to select members of [D] party? Is this about a woman's right to choose OR SOMETHING ELSE?

Does an aborted child exist? Can the mother pretend the child didn't exist?

What if the child wasn't even killed (yet)? But given away and sold away. You can't sell a baby once it's born and has a birth certificate. A child born at 9 months but "aborted" never existed.

You see them passing lies and trying to claim that doctors would force women to keep "ectopic" pregnancies (which are 100% lethal to child and mother). No doctor will ever do that. It's a death sentence. The MSM spreading lies. They're in a panic.

https://www.vogue.in/culture-and-living/gallery/45-celebrities-who-have-had-abortions-and-spoken-out-about-them

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Child_selling

The libertarian US economist Murray Rothbard (1926–1995) wrote in his book Ethics of Liberty, that parents should have the right to put a child out for adoption or sell the rights to the child in a voluntary contract. Rothbard suggested selling children as consumer goods in accordance with market forces, would benefit "everyone" involved in the market: "the natural parents, the children, and the foster parents.[32] In Rothbard's view, "the parent should not have a legal obligation to feed, clothe, or educate his children, since such obligations would entail positive acts coerced upon the parent and depriving the parent of his rights." Thus, parents should have the legal right to let any infant die by starvation. However, since "the purely free society will have a flourishing free market in children" he wrote, "the existence of a free baby market will bring such 'neglect' down to a minimum".[32]

Lawrence Stone reported some attempted sales of children accompanying wives sold by husbands to new husbands, one in 1815 and another discussed in 1763.[35] (Wife sale in England was illegal but believed to be lawful and widely practiced in southern England and the Midlands.

Child selling is old.

https://www.seattletimes.com/nation-world/who-buys-sells-and-uses-fetal-tissue-acquired-from-abortion-clinics/

Fetal tissue can be used only with the consent of the woman having an abortion. Some researchers receive the tissue from abortion clinics at their own institutions, or from tissue banks maintained by some universities. Many buy the tissue from companies that act as middlemen. Those companies pay small fees, usually $100 or less a specimen, to abortion providers like Planned Parenthood, who say they charge only what they need to cover their expenses. The companies then process the tissue and sell it to researchers for higher prices that reflect the processing.

It's not really regulated.

This wasn't quite the post I wanted to make. I had a different one, but I'll continue this in a separate post about that topic.