EPA gets handed a shit sandwich by SCOTUS
(media.greatawakening.win)
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
Comments (39)
sorted by:
What this means:
It literally was this way already.
This ruling is a nothing burger.
Any and all examples of "vague" authority granted to executive agencies will still be subjective and require the courts to intervene. It already was this way. That's what this case was an example of.
This case doesn't set a precedent like you all think it does. The precedent was already set, and the major questions doctrine remains as subjective as it always was.
What was the case precedent?
You should look up the major questions doctrine, non-delegation principle, and major rules doctrine. All different words for the same thing.
This type of ruling is nothing new.
So can you give specifics? For those of us who are trying to decipher the fall out?