Perhaps wait for Constitional Legal scholars, who specialize in analyzing SCOTUS decisions, to carefully read the run decision, research the attached foundational prior rulings cited in the decision, ponder the implications then write and share an assessment.

After that, follow the give and take between these scholars which expands their thinking and refines their initial assessments.

Personally I don't rely on anonymous strangers to opine, especially during this intense psywar when internet communities are flooded with professional psyop narrative peddlers.

I also dont react to click bait hot takes and headlines even from lawyers since SCOTUS tier Constitutional Law is a very niche field that's incredibly nuanced.

Thanks to Qs training, I'm now hyper aware of attempts to manipulate me. I notice when someone is trying to hook me by offering bait that can trigger a flood of toxic emotions. While not always done malevolently, taking the bait and allowing toxic emotions to be triggered still poisons my heart and mind.