SCOTUS issues order to drop mag bans, assault weapons bans, and carry bans! - The Great Awakening

508

SCOTUS issues order to drop mag bans, assault weapons bans, and carry bans! (media.greatawakening.win)

posted 2 years ago by identiynill 2 years ago by identiynill +508 / -0

171 comments download

171 comments share download save hide report block hide replies

You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.

Comments (171)

sorted by:

▲ 1 ▼

– c9AfEoF1StU7C2j2ZUv1 1 point 2 years ago +1 / -0

A single unprotected shot?

Did everyone who fought before ear protection was standardized lose the ability to properly hear?

Yes, very much so. Sound is measured in decibels - which is on a logarithmic scale. Immediate hearing damage starts at around 120-130 dB of sound pressure. This varies slightly from person to person, but even a .22 is about 125-130 dB in volume.

Sound is wack so to just give a high level overview - Sound energy doubles every 3 dB, and sound pressure doubles every 6 dB. In other words, you don't want to fuck with it. Gunfire is LOUD.

The guy who invented the suppressor did so because he went completely deaf from shooting too much. Double up on all shooting environments.

permalink parent save report block reply

▲ 1 ▼

– Wtf_socialismreally 1 point 2 years ago +1 / -0

It's just surprising; you would think that anyone who had experienced war ended up going deaf.

I guess on the plus side no Islamist terrorist fighting in their caves has any ear protection and that's one place where firing a gun would definitely suck with no protection

permalink parent save report block reply

To The Great Awakening

We are researchers who deal in open-source information, reasoned argument, and dank memes. We do battle in the sphere of ideas and ideas only. We neither need nor condone the use of force in our work here. WE ARE THE PUBLIC FACE OF Q. OUR MISSION IS TO RED-PILL NORMIES.

This is a pro-Q community. Please read and respect our rules below before contributing.

WHY Q?

"Those who cannot understand that we cannot simply start arresting w/o first: ensuring the safety & well-being of the population shifting the narrative removing those in DC through resignation to ensure success defeating ISIS/MS13 to prevent fail-safes freezing assets to remove network-to-network abilities kill off COC to prevent top-down comms/org, etc. etc. should not be participating in discussions." Q