The Supreme court kept Miranda rights the same and refused to expand them. It did not weaken them. It just shows how dumb the left is.
To summarize, the court stated that if your Miranda rights are violated, your recourse is to petition the court to throw out the evidence related to the violations. The lawsuit wanted the court to allow individuals (such as police officers) to be sued for monetary judgements in a civil court for any violations which would be something new. The court basically said that throwing out the evidence related to the violation is your recourse.
how are miranda rights bad?
The Supreme court kept Miranda rights the same and refused to expand them. It did not weaken them. It just shows how dumb the left is.
To summarize, the court stated that if your Miranda rights are violated, your recourse is to petition the court to throw out the evidence related to the violations. The lawsuit wanted the court to allow individuals (such as police officers) to be sued for monetary judgements in a civil court for any violations which would be something new. The court basically said that throwing out the evidence related to the violation is your recourse.
Here is more details on it:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=crGHEU6lKZg