They don't seem to understand the power that the supreme court holds with it's conservative majority. If they try and work around these rulings, they will end up in court, and they will lose again
As much as I hate to give credit to Mitch McConnell, he was a huge part of this. Helped swing the court in a totally different direction. I'd much rather have that moron Garland as AG than on the supreme court
They added the most insanely liberal and corrupt justice in the history of our courts that is young and will terrorize our country for the next 40 to 50 years.
If your going to mention the happening of the courts this week... where do you rank this with the rulings this week?
Would you not give all those rulings back to get a conservative in her place? I would.... If you would, does that not on its own substantiate some different than a winning week?
She will never never never ever vote our way. EVER!
I mean, it's a total injustice and it's completely unfathomable that the states that bent the rules were allowed to do so and allowed Joe Biden to cheat his way into the white house. Her place should've been filled by another Trump pick
If I could trade, I'd do it in a heartbeat. Unfortunately we cannot. Trump got 3 justices and Biden's pick shouldn't have been his to make.
However, a win is a win. It's a miracle that anything positive is happening while Democrats control the whole legislative branch. But to answer your question directly; A 4th conservative justice would've been better, but beggars can't be choosers
It's not a negative, but having SA rule correctly is difficult for me to chalk up as a win... Isn't this what their job is?
The very fact that shit is so bad that we actually are so worried about a trivial case with an obvious result might have a chance to lose is not a positive thing.
Will the EPA stop issuing these directives? If they don't stop and are not arrested and the states abide, then what?
Does the court matter if it they don't abide by the court?
They knew they were breaking our constitution when they did it to begin with. They aren't stupid. They know it takes forever to go through the courts and they can implement their illegal shit while it is. Then once it is ruled on they will tweak their directive and put it right back in play and enforce with the FBI and DOJ until it gets back... rinse and fucking repeat...
SA doesn't matter without FBI to enforce are laws or states willing to put forth laws to remove any FBI power or jurisdiction.
In short... That is what I think the best course of action is. Pass state laws preventing any FBI action within their state borders. CUT THEIR POWER!
take out the FBI.. thats a fucking win...
or become your own Country... which I'll take as well...
Well, that EPA ruling could potentially be used to argue that the FBI as a whole is unconstitutional because they were established by executive order, and therefore don't have the authority that they claim to have because Congress didn't give them that authority
Just need a case to be brought by a state AG with balls
They don't seem to understand the power that the supreme court holds with it's conservative majority. If they try and work around these rulings, they will end up in court, and they will lose again
As much as I hate to give credit to Mitch McConnell, he was a huge part of this. Helped swing the court in a totally different direction. I'd much rather have that moron Garland as AG than on the supreme court
They added the most insanely liberal and corrupt justice in the history of our courts that is young and will terrorize our country for the next 40 to 50 years. If your going to mention the happening of the courts this week... where do you rank this with the rulings this week?
Would you not give all those rulings back to get a conservative in her place? I would.... If you would, does that not on its own substantiate some different than a winning week?
She will never never never ever vote our way. EVER!
I mean, it's a total injustice and it's completely unfathomable that the states that bent the rules were allowed to do so and allowed Joe Biden to cheat his way into the white house. Her place should've been filled by another Trump pick
If I could trade, I'd do it in a heartbeat. Unfortunately we cannot. Trump got 3 justices and Biden's pick shouldn't have been his to make.
However, a win is a win. It's a miracle that anything positive is happening while Democrats control the whole legislative branch. But to answer your question directly; A 4th conservative justice would've been better, but beggars can't be choosers
It's not a negative, but having SA rule correctly is difficult for me to chalk up as a win... Isn't this what their job is?
The very fact that shit is so bad that we actually are so worried about a trivial case with an obvious result might have a chance to lose is not a positive thing.
Will the EPA stop issuing these directives? If they don't stop and are not arrested and the states abide, then what?
Does the court matter if it they don't abide by the court?
They knew they were breaking our constitution when they did it to begin with. They aren't stupid. They know it takes forever to go through the courts and they can implement their illegal shit while it is. Then once it is ruled on they will tweak their directive and put it right back in play and enforce with the FBI and DOJ until it gets back... rinse and fucking repeat...
SA doesn't matter without FBI to enforce are laws or states willing to put forth laws to remove any FBI power or jurisdiction.
In short... That is what I think the best course of action is. Pass state laws preventing any FBI action within their state borders. CUT THEIR POWER!
take out the FBI.. thats a fucking win...
or become your own Country... which I'll take as well...
Well, that EPA ruling could potentially be used to argue that the FBI as a whole is unconstitutional because they were established by executive order, and therefore don't have the authority that they claim to have because Congress didn't give them that authority
Just need a case to be brought by a state AG with balls