Hillary Clinton's Eyes Were BROWN in 1985
(rumble.com)
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
Comments (38)
sorted by:
And that still doesn't provide any sort of explanation as to why a camera would selectively alter a specific colour in a specific region on-screen.
Now, okay, if you google this topic, you can see old news sites with dead image links that purport that in 2003 Hillary started wearing contacts to go from brown to blue. Images have been scrubbed, but articles remain including references to an original Drudge article prior to whatever happened to Drudge.
And yet, in this video we see brown eyes in 1985.
Thus, either Hillary started wearing contacts far earlier, and the media was lying in 2003. Or there have been multiple Hillaries for decades, and communist infiltration is best achieved with a rotating cast of unstable stablemares.
Either scenario indicates that somebody was lying somewhere. I never even mentioned the possibility of doubles in my original post. Just that the eyes were different.
However, from the kneejerk reaction I got, it's clear that the subject makes people feel uncomfortable, and so there's something here that needs to be dug on further.
In this video I also see a color profile that makes her skin look a different color than it actually is, too. Thanks for all the hard work, anon. Keep honing in on that confirmation bias buddy
Confirmation of what? What is it that you think I'm trying to confirm here?
Again, skintone goes from "light brownish" to "dark brownish". It's not like she fucking turns bright green or anything.
Lighting issues aren't necessarily hue issues.
Again, you provide zero actual information, plenty of desperate uninformed counterproposals and mockery, but no actual information.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rJDHYVMQ1mI
Personally, my eyes are green but look brown on a bad camera.
You make us all look like fucking retards. I hope you know that.
Haha. It would be nice if you could provide actual arguments instead of "BAD CAMERA. FUCK YOU."
Besides, I already found articles about the change from brown to blue in 2003. Weird that you don't want to talk about those, or the fact that the images from the article got scrubbed.
You could just as easily say "There you go. Problem solved. Article mentions contacts, so it's contacts" leaving me to say "shucks you're right, maybe it's contacts", but rather than take the easy rebuttal making me look foolish and imaginative, you're reaaaaaally desperate for people not to question the entire situation.
All that does is highlight where people need to dig, dipshit.