Just looked - he said he tacked it onto the end after the paper was published. Look towards bottom of p2 he says he held onto it and added it on the fourth or fifth so I think it’s not like a ‘precognition’ or anything just added later
You said that "47 is often a CIA marker" and then provided this article as evidence. I read it. All I found supporting your assertion was this:
Note the number 47 on his head, telling us he is CIA. 1947 is year one of the CIA.
So the argument is that because the CIA was formed in 1947, the number "47" must refer to the CIA. And because this number refers to the CIA, the number "47" being tattooed on this shooter must indicate he is a CIA-brainwashed false flag being used by the Cabal.
Is this the full argument, or did I miss something?
I don't see any further discussion on the subject in this source. I looked around the website, but this guy has been writing about conspiracy stuff since at least 2004 and has thousands of essays, which do not appear readily searchable. So if there is some other information you meant for me to read, you'll need to help me find it.
Yeah it’s buried in one of the other essays I’m sure. Maybe he is wrong I think he could be but I noticed the 47 and it has come up before. Keep your eye out for it and see if you notice a pattern
Why is this dated four days before the shooting occurred?
Just looked - he said he tacked it onto the end after the paper was published. Look towards bottom of p2 he says he held onto it and added it on the fourth or fifth so I think it’s not like a ‘precognition’ or anything just added later
Ah, I see it.
You said that "47 is often a CIA marker" and then provided this article as evidence. I read it. All I found supporting your assertion was this:
So the argument is that because the CIA was formed in 1947, the number "47" must refer to the CIA. And because this number refers to the CIA, the number "47" being tattooed on this shooter must indicate he is a CIA-brainwashed false flag being used by the Cabal.
Is this the full argument, or did I miss something?
I don't see any further discussion on the subject in this source. I looked around the website, but this guy has been writing about conspiracy stuff since at least 2004 and has thousands of essays, which do not appear readily searchable. So if there is some other information you meant for me to read, you'll need to help me find it.
Yeah it’s buried in one of the other essays I’m sure. Maybe he is wrong I think he could be but I noticed the 47 and it has come up before. Keep your eye out for it and see if you notice a pattern