With respect Zeitreise, while he isn't articulating very well, raver9876 has a valid point (as do you).
I believe this is a fairly silly argument. While yes, an emulated proof of concept is nice, Iit proves nothing. It isn't the exact same build with the same tweaks, plug-ins, feature sets, and code base as the actual site.
The Anon doesn't have the access.
All this post proves is ignorance.
Give me a copy of windows or Linux a web app sitting on a lamp stack, whatever, and I too can show you how easy it is to hack and duplicate lab results, compromising security in a controlled environment.
With respect to the anon trying to prove something, this really only proves the code can be duplicated. We knew that already, at least some of us did.
About all this does is devide us.
We should wait and look for more posts, but in the meantime continue to take action as we know must be done.
Some vague statements that sound kinda like Q doesn't matter and there was no critical evidence, direction, or instructions dropped yet, so the new posts don't matter.
If they do in the future we'll address them then, as you say.
For now, I agree. If this kind of thing were to be valuable, it would need to be on the live server. Until then, stop bickering and fall back into line!
Man those meme cannons you frogs! Seek local leadership and get involved! Nothing more to see here, get back to work!
"So you believe the 2 newest Q posts to be entirely legitimate? "
Not especially, but like you i have an open mind to the possibility. Also, at this point it doesn't matter. There was no new info dropped that could clue us into anything, so if they are comms, they weren't for us (IMO, of course).
My main point was these "drops" seem to have divided the site into three camps, when instead we should be pressing our advantages from the recent wins.
FYI camps (1.drops r fake, 2.drops r real, 3.possible either way, wait for confirmation).
With respect Zeitreise, while he isn't articulating very well, raver9876 has a valid point (as do you).
I believe this is a fairly silly argument. While yes, an emulated proof of concept is nice, Iit proves nothing. It isn't the exact same build with the same tweaks, plug-ins, feature sets, and code base as the actual site.
The Anon doesn't have the access. All this post proves is ignorance.
Give me a copy of windows or Linux a web app sitting on a lamp stack, whatever, and I too can show you how easy it is to hack and duplicate lab results, compromising security in a controlled environment.
With respect to the anon trying to prove something, this really only proves the code can be duplicated. We knew that already, at least some of us did.
About all this does is devide us.
We should wait and look for more posts, but in the meantime continue to take action as we know must be done.
Some vague statements that sound kinda like Q doesn't matter and there was no critical evidence, direction, or instructions dropped yet, so the new posts don't matter. If they do in the future we'll address them then, as you say.
For now, I agree. If this kind of thing were to be valuable, it would need to be on the live server. Until then, stop bickering and fall back into line!
Man those meme cannons you frogs! Seek local leadership and get involved! Nothing more to see here, get back to work!
"So you believe the 2 newest Q posts to be entirely legitimate? "
Not especially, but like you i have an open mind to the possibility. Also, at this point it doesn't matter. There was no new info dropped that could clue us into anything, so if they are comms, they weren't for us (IMO, of course).
My main point was these "drops" seem to have divided the site into three camps, when instead we should be pressing our advantages from the recent wins.
FYI camps (1.drops r fake, 2.drops r real, 3.possible either way, wait for confirmation).
IMO 3 is best option.