I read it as a private construction. But even if it is a government legacy, the act is still an immoral destruction of property and a violation of freedom of speech. Your logic is no better than a common rioter.
I am perfectly familiar with how this country was formed. You are not familiar with the principles on which it was formed. Vandalism was not one of them. This is lost on you, since you have no refutation of the fact that this was immoral destruction of property and a violation of freedom of speech.
Govt property.
I read it as a private construction. But even if it is a government legacy, the act is still an immoral destruction of property and a violation of freedom of speech. Your logic is no better than a common rioter.
Your not familiar with how this country was formed are you?
I am perfectly familiar with how this country was formed. You are not familiar with the principles on which it was formed. Vandalism was not one of them. This is lost on you, since you have no refutation of the fact that this was immoral destruction of property and a violation of freedom of speech.