GME approves 4:1 stock split dividend. - The Great Awakening

336

GME approves 4:1 stock split dividend. (media.greatawakening.win)

posted 2 years ago by mitmont123 2 years ago by mitmont123 +336 / -0

323 comments download

323 comments share download save hide report block hide replies

You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.

Comments (323)

sorted by:

▲ -5 ▼

– MAG768720 -5 points 2 years ago +2 / -7

it isn't a split it's a dividend in the form of more shares.

Wrong.

Board of Directors has approved and declared a four-for-one split of the Company’s Class A common stock in the form of a stock dividend.

The stock dividend will be distributed after the close of trading on July 21, 2022. Trading will begin on a stock split-adjusted basis on July 22, 2022.

https://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/1326380/000132638022000100/a991-stocksplitannouncement.htm

permalink parent save report block reply

▲ 8 ▼

– Qaniso 8 points 2 years ago +8 / -0

LOL, You literally say wrong, than contradict and quote "stock dividend" . what part of Dividend don't you understand? good luck with your affairs.

permalink parent save report block reply

▲ -4 ▼

– MAG768720 -4 points 2 years ago +2 / -6

You said:

it isn't a split

I said:

Wrong.

And then I posted the SEC document where the company says they "declared a four-for-one split'

Do you have a reading comprehension problem, or just want it to be so bad that you ignore proof that you are wrong?

permalink parent save report block reply

▲ 7 ▼

– Qaniso 7 points 2 years ago +7 / -0

why are you cutting off my sentence? in your "quote" of me. Is it to change the meaning of what i said? because that's what you've done. why are you accusing me, of having, exactly what you seem to have, ie a "reading comprehension problem" these are the tactics of the left are they not? , misquoting/incomplete quotes, and accusing others of what you're doing? is that you kenny?

permalink parent save report block reply

▲ -4 ▼

– MAG768720 -4 points 2 years ago +2 / -6

why are you cutting off my sentence?

Because I quoted the relevant part. The rest is not relevant to your stupid claim.

You still want to ignore the company's own SEC filing.

Good luck with that.

permalink parent save report block reply

... continue reading thread?

To The Great Awakening

We are researchers who deal in open-source information, reasoned argument, and dank memes. We do battle in the sphere of ideas and ideas only. We neither need nor condone the use of force in our work here. WE ARE THE PUBLIC FACE OF Q. OUR MISSION IS TO RED-PILL NORMIES.

This is a pro-Q community. Please read and respect our rules below before contributing.

WHY Q?

"Those who cannot understand that we cannot simply start arresting w/o first: ensuring the safety & well-being of the population shifting the narrative removing those in DC through resignation to ensure success defeating ISIS/MS13 to prevent fail-safes freezing assets to remove network-to-network abilities kill off COC to prevent top-down comms/org, etc. etc. should not be participating in discussions." Q