In my opinion, the video is very clear. Nearby sodium lighting experienced a surge of power at nearly the same time as the Guidestones exploded into pieces, indicating a powerful electric field in the area.
There was no orange flash indicating high explosives and no saboteurs were caught on camera.
A lightning strike can be ruled out because there was none in the area at the time of the strike. Even if it was lightning, the time of the strike, 4:03.33, is a message only capable of being delivered by a DEW, which travel at 186,000 miles per second.
If it is known that this was a DEW strike, that would mean the US Military is responsible. They are the only ones with the available technology and control of Theater.
I had strong suspicions about the strike on the George Floyd mural for similar reasons.
I believe the fruits of POTUS45's formation of Space Force are now being realized.
Did you notice how quickly they managed to finish them off?
I predict that the site will, one day in the future, will host a statue of DJ Trump. First President of the Neo Republic of America.
To my way of thinking, that rapid demolition leans away from any DEW strike. If you were trying to cover up the use of conventional explosives, and hide any residues, traces of accelerants etc, then you would send in a team to remove anything incriminating as fast as you could.
What are presumed energy weapons probably wouldn't leave a trace if you figure all that was imparted was thermal energy - at the very least nothing that any lab could plausibly extract and analyze.
”thermal energy”Electromagnetic energy.The EM spectrum is all different types of electromagnetic energy (light) that can be reflective or emissive, visible to the human eye or invisible, high energy or low energy, short wavelength or long wavelength, in particle and/or wave form. Thermal radiation is emissive EM light radiation generated specifically from the motion of atoms referred to as “thermal energy.” There are areas of the EM spectrum (typically IR) that are characterized by thermal effects where some heat energy is converted into EM energy (Also note that, conversely, some EM energy can be converted in thermal energy), but there are also areas of the spectrum that generally are not.
In short, radiated EM energy can be thermal radiation from thermal energy, but not necessarily. So don’t confuse the two as interchangeable.
…
Now, that that’s clearer, I’d like to emphasize that, theoretically, directed energy can be from any part of the EM spectrum. Therefore, there can be varying effects, such as reflections or reemission in the same or different parts of the spectrum (dependent on the transmitting material), which are not entirely limited to thermal.
So your last statement is false—Depending on what area of the spectrum used & how much power through what material, a directed energy weapon would still leave traces (thermal effects being one of the more lasting ones, but not necessarily the only one) that can be detected by various types of EM sensors, be it immediately transferred/dissipated or lasting within the leftover medium. You still would want to get rid of or minimize those traces, especially if it might reveal that they were caused by some sort of Top Secret technology that needs to remain TS…
Conveniently, tearing up, moving, & mixing matter is one of the most effective ways to dissipate residual thermal energy or even transformative chemical effects within the material structure that might have been deposited or caused by a high energy EM beam.
I appreciate you took the time to write that, but you really didn't understand the point I was making perhaps. Thermal energy is probably the most expected and common outcome from whatever beam was used here, right? Sit in the sun, you are gonna feel it. Ditto on why food heats up in the microwave. Anything that kicks electrons up an energy state is going to inevitably heat up the material, and thats gonna happen by photon absorption from whatever EM is on it.
You are certainly right about signs of burning, melting etc being a trace though. I dont know how the material degrades under heat, but I figure there is gonna be some scorching evident.
Yeah, I wasn’t sure if you were just summarizing causation or legitimately confused the concepts, so I just clarified to be on the safe side. Sorry if I got a little Sperg-ish there—I have tendency to get too focused on the technical when I’m in that “mode,” heh.
But even if you are aware, I still hope it can clarify for anyone else reading who may not know the difference.
———————
Scorching might be one sign, but I’m talking beyond that & even internally—Like changing of the chemical structure due to the energy breaking chemical bonds & catalyzing other reactions with those reagents. You might find tiny pockets or traces of reformed granite or other igneous/metamorphic rock of different yet derivative chemical structure that ordinarily is not consistent with that rock. (You would want to get rid of the leftover rock, so a demo & disposal removes that particular kind of evidence.)
Someone also mentioned trapped water, or possibly catalyzed reactions creating water that was not there previously, heating up & causing enough pressure to explode. That makes sense to me because that rock exploded like a boiled egg I stuck in my microwave once.
Heating/energizing rock also weakens it structurally on a chemical & physical level, and causes the material to expand. If that happens too quickly (like with concentrated high power), the pressure from catalyzing reactions creating other chemical forms and/or expansion could cause it to explode with force.
It is possible to cut granite with lasers, for the record. So if the force & energy of a laser cutter is enough to mechanically crumble it, then on a physical force level, enough power can cause it to explode with greater force.
It all makes sense because the same energy that could leave sensor-detectable radiation and heat can also leave traces of rock chemical structure inconsistencies and can also cause an explosion.
——————-
There was another poster here somewhere that said they have more experience with DEWs and target effects, though that was specifically in the IR & they didn’t go too deep into specifics (I still need to respond and ask more about that)—Just that this was “not it.” I am wondering what “is it.” And after thinking about it a bit more & looking up some atuff, I think IR might not be the type of weapon used. So they may be right about that part.
Ironically, I also study IR, but I am not as experienced as other experts who have lived longer than I have, so I could be wrong & it might be wise to defer to that poster. Still, the circle of more experienced experts I have been able to work with study IR atmospheric effects & IR materials, specifically with the goal of getting around degraded environment limitations. It also helps the DEW argument that the weather seemed to be clearer/less degraded on the day the guidestones exploded. So I’m still skeptical & leaning on the side of plausibility. I’m also aware that the military compartmentalizes everything, especially technology that is highly TS, so the other more experienced poster may not be aware of some work being done outside but still related to his specific area. Especially if we’re going to consider very, very specific IR bands or other bands outside IR…
…Like microwave lasers, which have been studied since the 50s. That type of energy beam would give you that microwaved boiled egg explosion effect. And while the waves have a tendency to be be absorbed by water in the atmosphere, they could still penetrate given enough power, & a close enough distance to the target—So maybe the laser isn’t coming from the sky strapped to a high flying plane or satellite, but somewhere nearby under cover from a land vehicle or a low-flying plane. It was dark when the explosion happened (4 am), so that’s good cover for a stealth plane or drone. I’m curious to see what the planefags noticed around the area at that time… This type of beam would work ideally in a place that is already hot, less humid/high pressure, & without cloud cover, which is exactly what the weather conditions were the morning the guidestones were destroyed according to an archived weather map (showing conditions around 7 am). The heating of the atmosphere caused by such a high-powered beam would also cause unusual stormy weather, which I have been noticing in various places lately. And it just so happens that the same afternoon at 2:15pm, there was suddenly a tornado warning for all of Northeast GA, including Eberton County, which is exactly where the guidestones were. You don’t have a tornado system suddenly show up in a dry weather system with no wet systems coming in and clashing with it. Though the wind at the time was blowing a pocket of a low pressure/wet system south, I’m not sure the pressure difference would be enough to cause such strong disturbances & enough rotation to cause a tornado without some help... I think this was a residual effect of the atmosphere being disturbed/irradiated with concentrated (possibly microwave) energy in that particular spot.
While a lot has been studied, when it comes to EM radiation, I’d say far from everything has been studied, at least not in specifics, nor all applications, nor with public disclosure… Or maybe I’m just an optimist.
——————-
Anyway, I’m just rambling about my theories out loud now. I will take no offense if you ignore me, lol.