not sure you are making your point. sleepydude and killaskinna posed reasonable concerns.
you are asking to be "proven wrong" but I don't see where you provide evidence to support you theory that the new ToS "were written by white hats." for example, can you point out any MS executives whose background or network is anti-globalist? are there any signs that MS being broken up is underway?
I'll throw myself in the moronic camp. even if those ToS were written by white hats, it only validates the Orwellian power of MS to scan your personal documents.
Not vaccinating your kids probably harmful in the eyes of the corrupted
It all depends on who defines "harm."
To Microsoft, harm may mean telling a child there are two genders.
You post that online and poof. Your computer stops working.
not sure you are making your point. sleepydude and killaskinna posed reasonable concerns.
you are asking to be "proven wrong" but I don't see where you provide evidence to support you theory that the new ToS "were written by white hats." for example, can you point out any MS executives whose background or network is anti-globalist? are there any signs that MS being broken up is underway?
I'll throw myself in the moronic camp. even if those ToS were written by white hats, it only validates the Orwellian power of MS to scan your personal documents.
So Bill Gates isn't allowed to use MS products?
And they have to put this clause into a software TOS?
Great, white hats, now my 7rh grader will claim Microsofts own TOS prevent him from doing his homework on its products. /s
Probably criticising transgenderism would count.