Why does Q still have to rely on disinformation and secrecy and plausible deniability if the evidence already out there “should be clear to everyone”?
And as long as Q is still playing optics, still apparently hiding his probable role in carrying out justice, and as long as plausible deniability must exist, then Q is actively making it harder to prove the Plan, on purpose.
That is completely unaffected by whether or not Reddit permits Q posts. That has to do with the actions Q is purposefully taking to hide his identity and the proof of his actions (such as McCain’s arrest and execution, for instance).
So why do you blame people for being skeptical of Q’s claims when Q is still taking so many steps to hide the Plan’s existence and results from the world?
So, like I said, regardless of the reasoning, Q has a lot of work to do to ensure that he isn’t fighting an army of good Samaritans who are unwilling to read the legal justifications of PatelPatriot while our politicians are executed by some Secret Authority that the vast majority of people have not verified and whose identities are not even known.
I can promise on whatever you want that I am not being paid to be here. I do not have an interest in dismantling the Q movement. I have no interest in convincing anyone here of anything.
And I put fifty times the work into understanding this movement than anyone I’ve met. I am convincable and willing to do the work. I am exactly the kind of person who, if convinced, can do the work bridging with the normies who can’t or won’t do the work.
I am doing the work that Q people asks normies to do. I am just not coming to the same conclusions in my research.
Zeitreise constantly suggests that I am too stupid to get it, and that I am some sort of outlier whose position on the Q World is completely unrepresentative of the real world.
Do you think that’s true? Do you think that most cops, lawyers, military officers, and other authority figures are going to put more work into understanding your justifications for the Plan than I do?
Do you think any of the millions of people in a position to stop Q from carrying out some or all of the Plan will listen as patiently as I have?
Q is simply information to inform people of the truth of the evil in this world. It's difficult to consider your claim of understanding Q, while overlooking this.
He informs us of a Plan, but then takes steps to conceal the Plan.
“What I’m saying may lead you to the truth. If you don’t find it, you aren’t looking hard enough and need to dig deeper. If it’s the opposite of what you expect, think mirror. If I appear to have misled you, disinformation is necessary, in order to force the enemy to expend ammo.”
He calls for a Great Awakening, but insists on plausible deniability. He points us to where he insists we will find evidence, but warns that he might be lying and spreading disinformation.
“Transparency is the only way,” but he refuses to be transparent about who he is. “Accountability is the only way,” but insists on secrecy and plausible deniability to protect himself from accountability.
Honestly, I have taken WAY fewer steps to stop the Awakening than Q has, by that measure.
I have prayed to the Lord for the patience to deal with people like you so please forgive me if I attack you. I don't mean to demean or insult.
I have noticed and appreciated that, truly. The problem is definitely that you and I both have the stamina to argue for weeks without sleep, and you perhaps just have a little more than I do. I do always read and absorb the things you write, even if I don't agree or have the time or energy to follow you down that particular rabbit hole.
Your problem is you have repeatedly obsessed over Q instead of the subject material and as a result it positions you in sort of this alien place that no anon is willing to go.
I get that you don't see Q as an important part, and rather look at Q's words.
But I demonstrated last time why that can't be good enough for me. Because Q's personal credibility DOES MATTER to you.
Because when Q tells you to look at something, you look until you find the evidence that you believe he wanted you to find.
And if Q's identity actually doesn't matter, then you would be suggesting that if I proved, beyond the shadow of a doubt, that Q was Ron Watkins, that wouldn't shake your belief in the Plan whatsoever. Because Ron Watkin's words would still be as credible as any military operative. Only the words matter, after all.
Is that something you're willing to stand behind?
If Q's identity or credibility didn't matter, then you would have no reason to, say, "look at the therapists." I asked you last time, when Q told you guys to research that, the end result was that you, Zeitreise, believe that many, if not most mass shootings are the result of objectively Satanic or Communist therapists purposefully manipulating their patients via MKUltra brainwashing techniques on behalf of the Cabal.
When I asked for even one story of a Satanist therapist provably turning their patient into a mass murderer, any primary source document for this, I didn't get one. I got stories in which you wanted me to assume the therapists were Satanist, and assume the therapists betrayed their client, and assumed that (relatively common) mistakes were done on purpose, with purpose.
Where is the template of the Satanic therapist that is creating mass murderers? Who, by name, has done this, and proven that this concept has ever occurred?
As I've said, I am always impressed by you and Q World's ability to identify potential vulnerabilities in any system. If there is a place where a Satanist could potentially cause a mass shooting event, I can rely on you to find it.
But can I rely on you to follow up from Q's prediction, and produce the actual hard evidence I would need to prove that a therapist was Satanist? To prove that a Satanist therapist deliberately set a mass shooter on the world? To prove that even a single therapist was answering to a Cabal?
Can I rely on you as an objective prosecutor, or only as a defense attorney?
Perhaps it should be clear to everyone.
So why isn’t it?
Why does Q still have to rely on disinformation and secrecy and plausible deniability if the evidence already out there “should be clear to everyone”?
And as long as Q is still playing optics, still apparently hiding his probable role in carrying out justice, and as long as plausible deniability must exist, then Q is actively making it harder to prove the Plan, on purpose.
That is completely unaffected by whether or not Reddit permits Q posts. That has to do with the actions Q is purposefully taking to hide his identity and the proof of his actions (such as McCain’s arrest and execution, for instance).
So why do you blame people for being skeptical of Q’s claims when Q is still taking so many steps to hide the Plan’s existence and results from the world?
Why isn't it? Because of the traits your Qult show: following propaganda instead of truth.
It's quite simple when you think about it. But can get lost by writing paragraphs and paragraphs of mental gymnastics.
So, like I said, regardless of the reasoning, Q has a lot of work to do to ensure that he isn’t fighting an army of good Samaritans who are unwilling to read the legal justifications of PatelPatriot while our politicians are executed by some Secret Authority that the vast majority of people have not verified and whose identities are not even known.
I can promise on whatever you want that I am not being paid to be here. I do not have an interest in dismantling the Q movement. I have no interest in convincing anyone here of anything.
And I put fifty times the work into understanding this movement than anyone I’ve met. I am convincable and willing to do the work. I am exactly the kind of person who, if convinced, can do the work bridging with the normies who can’t or won’t do the work.
I am doing the work that Q people asks normies to do. I am just not coming to the same conclusions in my research.
Zeitreise constantly suggests that I am too stupid to get it, and that I am some sort of outlier whose position on the Q World is completely unrepresentative of the real world.
Do you think that’s true? Do you think that most cops, lawyers, military officers, and other authority figures are going to put more work into understanding your justifications for the Plan than I do?
Do you think any of the millions of people in a position to stop Q from carrying out some or all of the Plan will listen as patiently as I have?
Q is simply information to inform people of the truth of the evil in this world. It's difficult to consider your claim of understanding Q, while overlooking this.
He informs us of a Plan, but then takes steps to conceal the Plan.
“What I’m saying may lead you to the truth. If you don’t find it, you aren’t looking hard enough and need to dig deeper. If it’s the opposite of what you expect, think mirror. If I appear to have misled you, disinformation is necessary, in order to force the enemy to expend ammo.”
He calls for a Great Awakening, but insists on plausible deniability. He points us to where he insists we will find evidence, but warns that he might be lying and spreading disinformation.
“Transparency is the only way,” but he refuses to be transparent about who he is. “Accountability is the only way,” but insists on secrecy and plausible deniability to protect himself from accountability.
Honestly, I have taken WAY fewer steps to stop the Awakening than Q has, by that measure.
i didn't disagree with anything you said here, anon.
I have noticed and appreciated that, truly. The problem is definitely that you and I both have the stamina to argue for weeks without sleep, and you perhaps just have a little more than I do. I do always read and absorb the things you write, even if I don't agree or have the time or energy to follow you down that particular rabbit hole.
I get that you don't see Q as an important part, and rather look at Q's words.
But I demonstrated last time why that can't be good enough for me. Because Q's personal credibility DOES MATTER to you.
Because when Q tells you to look at something, you look until you find the evidence that you believe he wanted you to find.
And if Q's identity actually doesn't matter, then you would be suggesting that if I proved, beyond the shadow of a doubt, that Q was Ron Watkins, that wouldn't shake your belief in the Plan whatsoever. Because Ron Watkin's words would still be as credible as any military operative. Only the words matter, after all.
Is that something you're willing to stand behind?
If Q's identity or credibility didn't matter, then you would have no reason to, say, "look at the therapists." I asked you last time, when Q told you guys to research that, the end result was that you, Zeitreise, believe that many, if not most mass shootings are the result of objectively Satanic or Communist therapists purposefully manipulating their patients via MKUltra brainwashing techniques on behalf of the Cabal.
When I asked for even one story of a Satanist therapist provably turning their patient into a mass murderer, any primary source document for this, I didn't get one. I got stories in which you wanted me to assume the therapists were Satanist, and assume the therapists betrayed their client, and assumed that (relatively common) mistakes were done on purpose, with purpose.
Where is the template of the Satanic therapist that is creating mass murderers? Who, by name, has done this, and proven that this concept has ever occurred?
As I've said, I am always impressed by you and Q World's ability to identify potential vulnerabilities in any system. If there is a place where a Satanist could potentially cause a mass shooting event, I can rely on you to find it.
But can I rely on you to follow up from Q's prediction, and produce the actual hard evidence I would need to prove that a therapist was Satanist? To prove that a Satanist therapist deliberately set a mass shooter on the world? To prove that even a single therapist was answering to a Cabal?
Can I rely on you as an objective prosecutor, or only as a defense attorney?