Barring all the tech that is still either on the early experimental stage and the stuff the Deep State deliberately blocks from reaching the more mainstream academic science media, how far do you think mankind (and the U.S. in particular) is from developing functional nuclear fusion reactors ?
Comments (21)
sorted by:
Review the recent Buffalo grocery store ‘massacre’. This was actually more likely a ‘Jack Reacher’ movie plot where they took out 1 specific target but covered the motive by shooting 9 innocents. One of the victims there was a security guard that was posting all sorts of videos on YouTube how he converted his Chevy Silverado to run on Hydrogen..!
Where did you learn about this? Very interesting!
I’m pretty sure it was from a post here on GAW that it was mentioned just days after the shooting so I watched some of his videos, which led me down a rabbit hole, and now I’m trying to convert a gasoline generator into a hydrogen powered one in my shop. One thing leads to another - I can’t stop digging!
Not needed.
https://patents.google.com/?inventor=Salvatore+Cezar+Pais
He has a forth patent. A box thing... Put in a couple mega watts of power... get out something like 1.2 Terrawatts of power out.
Drawing energy from the universal vacuum the energy field all around us.
Aye
With the shit I think we have had withheld, fusion technology is low brow tech comparatively.
We should jump it and go straight to free energy via frequency and vibration technology.
Cold Fusion. Hot Fusion (ITER) is always 20 years away, its a scam.
https://mathscholar.org/2019/03/lenr-energy-science-or-pseudoscience/
Look up Galen Winsor on YT. Built and ran nuclear reactors. Says they're totally safe, but population is fed lies about nonexistent danger and how much they cost, in order to use them as a population tax without calling them that. Essentially near-free safe energy already developed, kept under wraps.
https://libertariannews.org/2012/06/27/man-eats-uranium-drinks-and-swims-in-reactor-water-ignites-plutonium-in-his-bare-hand/?fbclid=IwAR21D8V-BLKmJ151rF2iVmgMk2J5uhT_g4CxyCzLDf8K3o0VocPgusLcQMg
Thank you!
40 years in industry; not anywhere near close. Temperatures required to initiate reaction are ~100 million C, about six times the temp of the sun. A multinational team have been working decades on a design that magnetically suspends the plasma in a torus shaped structure to contain the reaction (search Tokamak fusion reactor). What possibly could go wrong?
There was some premature ejaculation concerning the potential for cold fusion reaction about 20 years ago, but I believe that idea has long since shot its was and gone limp.
and hydrogen for power / transportation
It's already being built. https://www.technologyreview.com/2022/02/23/1045122/fusion-power-mit-startup-commonwealth/
A new type of magnetic containment technology developed a decade ago is responsible for making this a [soon to be] reality.
Not an engineer, just a science fan, but I think it is one of those ideas which will suddenly self-assemble into fact over some little detail that is currently unthought of. I know a lot of people are going to say there's a plot to suppress an already working model, and of course any energy producers now would fight for their current turf: but on the other hand, they would all be over the moon to be the first to get that working model, so I can only see deliberate suppression as jockeying to beat the competition. Plus this would be such a big deal for physics, nothing could stop the discoverers from bragging about it. I think we are close.
This is very technical stuff, I don't understand a great deal of it but anything that can be understood in a couple of weeks isn't worth very much.
They are very close to building an over unity engine that a good engineer can build in a home workshop, its open sourced as well.
https://remoteview.substack.com/
Not sure which of these you referred to. I read most of them and it's beyond me too, but apparently the crux of discussion is the possibility of a certain structure, the "bagel," to influence plasma flux. The articles with "bagel" in the title have good pictures of the structures they are trying to make. (As an aside, I do know a little about modeling with Lightwave, a 3D graphic tool, and think that the learning curve might be a little steep for the 30 day free trial.) The video about the Hutchison effect pertains to what they hope to learn from these bagels, but the "response" posts are typical of scientific squabbles. I get that the Russians had similar ideas some time ago, and the blog author was not impressed by the video author, which is why he threw all these research quotes at him. But this actually supports my point. They are arguing about influencing the direction of reactions with something that is still more theoretical than practical. It will be something like this that will eventually give everyone a big "aha!" moment. Just as Edison tried over 800 substances to make a filament that would work in an incandescent light bulb, and also had to learn how to pump the oxygen out of the bulb and replace it with something non-combustble, but that was trivial compared to a fusion reaction.
Thanks for looking at this site, its more than most do. The blog author and the video author are one and the same man, if i read you right on this.
If you are interested in some comparatively easy videos to watch please try "molecular particle accelerators" "doppelganger" "how was nan madol built" and "the bagel game, there is nothing beyond that"
Your question assumes that is the next energy advance. Ask yourself, do you really think the human made “UFOs” are run on nuclear fusion?
10 years, 5 if you let ELON do it!