Until people can see the evidence of what they have been told is not true and that those in control tried to destroy the proof - they will not believe they have been used.
People might also see how long the JFK cover up has been going on and how the media wont even report what is in the public domain
The cover up is real and shows a long term power far greater than those who carried out the original plan whether it is about JFK or Gulf War 1 & 2 etc etc
There are many examples of the media covering up events or news promoted by an administration long after that administration has passed away
Any normal media service would report and follow up on these events and new information if it was not controlled -
if only to say hey look at this Justice Dept letter disclosed by the JFK Records Act which shows Oswald could not have done the shooting from the 6th Floor and come down the stairs
because
people were on the stairs
and htis information was hidden and these tapes and transcripts were deliberately destroyed
and recorded as officially destroyed
and parties who gave supporting evidence were not followed up on or ignored
Instead there is total Media silence
Just like over WMD in the 2nd Iraq War or the Bush 41 advice to Saddam that the US would not get involved over Kuwait
In 1990, The George Bush's Administration's message to Baghdad, articulated in public statements in Washington by senior policy makers and delivered directly to Mr. Hussein by the United States Ambassador, April C. Glaspie, was this:
"The United States was concerned about Iraq's military buildup on its border with Kuwait, but did not intend to take sides in what it perceived as a no-win border dispute between Arab neighbors."
The U.S. State Department had earlier told Saddam that Washington had
"no special defense or security commitments to Kuwait."
In a meeting with Mr. Hussein in Baghdad on July 25, eight days before the invasion, Ms. Glaspie urged the Iraqi leader to settle his differences with Kuwait peacefully but added,
"We have no opinion on the Arab-Arab conflicts, like your border disagreement with Kuwait,'" according to an Iraqi document described as a transcript of their conversation.
There was some ammunition neatly arranged on the windowsill of the Schoolbook Repository that day however, it did not fit the rifle they later found in that room.
An FBI man was asked if Oswald's fingerprints were on the rifle. Said FBI man took the rifle to the morgue where Oswald was being kept and when he returned he affirmed that Oswald's thumbprint was on the rifle.
Just a thought, but if you wanted to shoot at a target, would you want to fire as the target was travelling almost directly towards you or would you wait until you had to lean right out of the window so you could point your rifle to the right while the target was travelling across your line of sight?
That thought is something that has stuck with me for years. He had a totally clear and easy shot when the Kennedy motorcade was coming directly toward the TSBD, but he waited until the car was moving away, going downhill, exiting the area? It makes no sense and greatly decreased the odds of a hit.
However, the other shooters who were in the building to the left of the TSBD had a clear shot as did the man hiding in the drain just where the driver slowed the car right down. Allegedly!
See the following link below for a review of the evidence about the shells and finger prints.
It states that there was a deep mark on one shell that ment it could not have been fired and it was shown as only possible to create this mark if a shell had been the last shell in a magazine and it was not there was one bullet still in the rifle found -
On the finger prints the FBI investigator says it was not possible to find any prints and he saw no evidence that prints had been tested for before he received the rifle - listen to
Show #1067
Original airdate: Nov 04, 2021
Guests: Johnny Cairns
Topics: JFK Assassination Research
Article: A Presumption of Innocence: Lee Harvey Oswald, Part 3 by Johnny Cairns
Part 1 and Part 2 of this series by Johnny Cairns
Commission Exhibit (CE) 142 (the paper bag)
CE 399 (the magic bullet)
CE 543, 544, 545 (shells found on the sixth floor)
The shells were picked up from the floor before they were photographed
FREE Download Ebook: Impossible: The Case Against Lee Harvey Oswald (PDF) by Barry Krusch
The chain of custody for the shells is nonexistent
Lt. Day testified that the shell was marked by someone who was not at the crime scene
According to the WC, the shells were discovered by Deputy Sheriff Luke Mooney
Day did not mark the shells at the scene of the crime even though they were in his possession
He placed these unmarked shells into an unsealed envelope
Under these circumstances, how could Day swear under oath that the shells being presented in evidence
against Oswald were the same ones allegedly found in the aftermath of the president’s murder?
The shells would never have been admitted into evidence in a trial against Oswald
Dent in the shell (CE 543)
FREE Download Ebook: Six Seconds in Dallas by Josiah "Tink" Thompson
Not a single box of ammunition was found among Oswald's belongings
What should have happened regarding the chain of custody for the shells
Oswald would not have been convicted at the trial
The palm prints on the rifle
The bulk of the core evidence was transferred to the FBI on 11.23.1963
www.patspeer.com
Unsmoking the Gun by Pat Speer
The 1993 PBS Frontline program Who Was Lee Harvey Oswald?
Johnny Cairns' book Case Not Closed to be released shortly
Further info including National Archives record of destruction of the Victoria Adams Tapes and Testimony
https://thegirlonthestairs.wordpress.com/2017/04/24/the-missing-link/
http://www.whokilledjfk.net/another_witness.htm
about time truth out
oak sacrifice and both bushes were there
too true
Until people can see the evidence of what they have been told is not true and that those in control tried to destroy the proof - they will not believe they have been used.
People might also see how long the JFK cover up has been going on and how the media wont even report what is in the public domain
The cover up is real and shows a long term power far greater than those who carried out the original plan whether it is about JFK or Gulf War 1 & 2 etc etc
There are many examples of the media covering up events or news promoted by an administration long after that administration has passed away
Any normal media service would report and follow up on these events and new information if it was not controlled -
if only to say hey look at this Justice Dept letter disclosed by the JFK Records Act which shows Oswald could not have done the shooting from the 6th Floor and come down the stairs
because
people were on the stairs
and htis information was hidden and these tapes and transcripts were deliberately destroyed
and recorded as officially destroyed
and parties who gave supporting evidence were not followed up on or ignored
Instead there is total Media silence
Just like over WMD in the 2nd Iraq War or the Bush 41 advice to Saddam that the US would not get involved over Kuwait
In 1990, The George Bush's Administration's message to Baghdad, articulated in public statements in Washington by senior policy makers and delivered directly to Mr. Hussein by the United States Ambassador, April C. Glaspie, was this:
"The United States was concerned about Iraq's military buildup on its border with Kuwait, but did not intend to take sides in what it perceived as a no-win border dispute between Arab neighbors."
The U.S. State Department had earlier told Saddam that Washington had
"no special defense or security commitments to Kuwait."
In a meeting with Mr. Hussein in Baghdad on July 25, eight days before the invasion, Ms. Glaspie urged the Iraqi leader to settle his differences with Kuwait peacefully but added,
"We have no opinion on the Arab-Arab conflicts, like your border disagreement with Kuwait,'" according to an Iraqi document described as a transcript of their conversation.
https://www.dispropaganda.com/single-post/2018/12/01/How-George-Bush-senior-greenlighted-Saddams-invasion-of-Kuwait
https://rense.com/general69/41.htm
George H. W. Bush shot JFK.
Other rumours:
There was some ammunition neatly arranged on the windowsill of the Schoolbook Repository that day however, it did not fit the rifle they later found in that room.
An FBI man was asked if Oswald's fingerprints were on the rifle. Said FBI man took the rifle to the morgue where Oswald was being kept and when he returned he affirmed that Oswald's thumbprint was on the rifle.
Just a thought, but if you wanted to shoot at a target, would you want to fire as the target was travelling almost directly towards you or would you wait until you had to lean right out of the window so you could point your rifle to the right while the target was travelling across your line of sight?
That thought is something that has stuck with me for years. He had a totally clear and easy shot when the Kennedy motorcade was coming directly toward the TSBD, but he waited until the car was moving away, going downhill, exiting the area? It makes no sense and greatly decreased the odds of a hit.
However, the other shooters who were in the building to the left of the TSBD had a clear shot as did the man hiding in the drain just where the driver slowed the car right down. Allegedly!
I got my info from [From JFK to 911 Everything Is A Rich Man's Trick.] (https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jiHm2S0w3_Q) It is long but a good watch if you have the time.
See the following link below for a review of the evidence about the shells and finger prints.
It states that there was a deep mark on one shell that ment it could not have been fired and it was shown as only possible to create this mark if a shell had been the last shell in a magazine and it was not there was one bullet still in the rifle found -
On the finger prints the FBI investigator says it was not possible to find any prints and he saw no evidence that prints had been tested for before he received the rifle - listen to
Show #1067 Original airdate: Nov 04, 2021 Guests: Johnny Cairns Topics: JFK Assassination Research
See link below for show and book reference
https://www.blackopradio.com/archives2021.html
Look for
Article: A Presumption of Innocence: Lee Harvey Oswald, Part 3 by Johnny Cairns Part 1 and Part 2 of this series by Johnny Cairns Commission Exhibit (CE) 142 (the paper bag) CE 399 (the magic bullet) CE 543, 544, 545 (shells found on the sixth floor) The shells were picked up from the floor before they were photographed FREE Download Ebook: Impossible: The Case Against Lee Harvey Oswald (PDF) by Barry Krusch The chain of custody for the shells is nonexistent Lt. Day testified that the shell was marked by someone who was not at the crime scene According to the WC, the shells were discovered by Deputy Sheriff Luke Mooney Day did not mark the shells at the scene of the crime even though they were in his possession He placed these unmarked shells into an unsealed envelope Under these circumstances, how could Day swear under oath that the shells being presented in evidence against Oswald were the same ones allegedly found in the aftermath of the president’s murder? The shells would never have been admitted into evidence in a trial against Oswald Dent in the shell (CE 543) FREE Download Ebook: Six Seconds in Dallas by Josiah "Tink" Thompson Not a single box of ammunition was found among Oswald's belongings What should have happened regarding the chain of custody for the shells Oswald would not have been convicted at the trial The palm prints on the rifle The bulk of the core evidence was transferred to the FBI on 11.23.1963 www.patspeer.com Unsmoking the Gun by Pat Speer The 1993 PBS Frontline program Who Was Lee Harvey Oswald? Johnny Cairns' book Case Not Closed to be released shortly
JUST GO AWAY PLEASE THATS FOR 2055.