This has been my litmus test from the beginning to determine if so called conservatives are on our side regarding the 2020 election fraud. Everyone's on board with how the laws were illegally changed because they didn't go through the state legislatures, blah, blah, blah.
That approach always gives them an "out" with their potential critics. What I mean is the not so subtle message is, even if "illegal" there is still the potential of a living human being behind the vote (whether or not it should be legally counted).
The part they don't want to risk taking a firm position on is the obviously illegal under anyone's definition outright vote switching and vote creation by the algorithms of the machines themselves (including by, but not limited to hostile foreign actors). Until a "conservative" commentator goes there on the election fraud I have little use (or respect) for them.
This has been my litmus test from the beginning to determine if so called conservatives are on our side regarding the 2020 election fraud. Everyone's on board with how the laws were illegally changed because they didn't go through the state legislatures, blah, blah, blah.
That approach always gives them an "out" with their potential critics. What I mean is the not so subtle message is, even if "illegal" there is still the potential of a living human being behind the vote (whether or not it should be legally counted).
The part they don't want to risk taking a firm position on is the obviously illegal under anyone's definition outright vote switching and vote creation by the algorithms of the machines themselves (including by, but not limited to hostile foreign actors). Until a "conservative" commentator goes there on the election fraud I have little use (or respect) for them.