Moderators are not leaders. I am not certain what led you to that belief. Users can do their own research and make their own arguments.
Frankly, the only person from the internet that is following me appears to be you. :)
Also, would you like me to be more heavy-handed in my censorship? Right now, the only things I remove are posts in violation of Reddit’s TOS, which includes violence and, to your displeasure, some stuff related to Q posts. Luckily, we can discuss that stuff here, without Reddit’s TOS having any say over it.
And frankly, given how anti-censorship you claim to be, it is surprising that you sometimes call for me to be banned from here or for me to enact more heavy censorship on Reddit. Neither of those suggestions indicates a comfort with speech that contests your own, but I am open to an explanation.
I don’t “let flourish” anything simply by refusing to censor it. And people from my sub don’t provide me the conversation I’m interested in having. I’m not going to spend my limited time talking about Q to people who aren’t contesting what I already believe I know, obviously.
You are so insistent on connecting that sub with this place. You aren’t my nemesis. You’re just someone I disagree with, and someone who spends far more time obsessing over Reddit than I do.
You’re upset that lizard people are associated with the Q movement because you don’t believe in lizard people and it makes you look like you’re associating with lunatics.
Some people around here believe the same thing about Flat Earthers. And yet, despite the feeling by some that Flat Earth and other such conspiracies dilute the Q movement, it’s tolerated.
Neither you nor the GAW at large is the arbiter of what is and is not a philosophy associated with Q people. This is not the only Q community out there, and others disconnected from this place have their own philosophies, such as the JFK Jr stuff or medbed technology.
You don’t get to tell me that isn’t related to Q stuff. You don’t get to decide who is and isn’t a True Believer based entirely on whether or not they agree with your specific conclusions when you Questioned Reality.
Your perspective isn’t the only one out there, and not everyone who agrees only partially with your worldview is a Deep State plant or False Flag designed to make you look stupid. There is a wide spectrum of belief, even here on GAW.
A diversity of thought should not be threatening or suspicious, friend.
Yeah, I don’t have many other ways to explain this, so I will try to be very direct.
The outside world, including QHC, does not care about what is in the Q posts. The Q posts are not a threat to anybody.
What the outside world, and QHC, care about is what people who believe in Q believe in.
Which is not necessarily the same thing as a direct translation of Q.
Some people take literally what you assume to be disinformation by Q. Sometimes vice-versa. Some people have different motivations assigned to Trump’s vaccine support and build entire new theories based on that.
And some people who believe in Q have used Q’s philosophy to justify examining every other theory. Including lizard people. Why not? Could the Cabal not cover that up?
To be perfectly clear, Zeitreise, your theory on what Q “really meant” is one of thousands. And nobody else is less of a Q believer than you for finding different answers to Q’s questions, since Q never directly answered most of them.
If you’re refusing to accept that different, potentially valid conspiracies that Q may have revealed that you simply are unable to see, then you either believe yourself to be smarter than every other Q researcher alive, or you’re simply wrong.
So, are you the smartest researcher on this board, Zeitreise? Is there even a point in having a research board over any topic you’ve investigated?
Moderators are not leaders. I am not certain what led you to that belief. Users can do their own research and make their own arguments.
Frankly, the only person from the internet that is following me appears to be you. :)
Also, would you like me to be more heavy-handed in my censorship? Right now, the only things I remove are posts in violation of Reddit’s TOS, which includes violence and, to your displeasure, some stuff related to Q posts. Luckily, we can discuss that stuff here, without Reddit’s TOS having any say over it.
And frankly, given how anti-censorship you claim to be, it is surprising that you sometimes call for me to be banned from here or for me to enact more heavy censorship on Reddit. Neither of those suggestions indicates a comfort with speech that contests your own, but I am open to an explanation.
I don’t “let flourish” anything simply by refusing to censor it. And people from my sub don’t provide me the conversation I’m interested in having. I’m not going to spend my limited time talking about Q to people who aren’t contesting what I already believe I know, obviously.
You are so insistent on connecting that sub with this place. You aren’t my nemesis. You’re just someone I disagree with, and someone who spends far more time obsessing over Reddit than I do.
You’re upset that lizard people are associated with the Q movement because you don’t believe in lizard people and it makes you look like you’re associating with lunatics.
Some people around here believe the same thing about Flat Earthers. And yet, despite the feeling by some that Flat Earth and other such conspiracies dilute the Q movement, it’s tolerated.
Neither you nor the GAW at large is the arbiter of what is and is not a philosophy associated with Q people. This is not the only Q community out there, and others disconnected from this place have their own philosophies, such as the JFK Jr stuff or medbed technology.
You don’t get to tell me that isn’t related to Q stuff. You don’t get to decide who is and isn’t a True Believer based entirely on whether or not they agree with your specific conclusions when you Questioned Reality.
Your perspective isn’t the only one out there, and not everyone who agrees only partially with your worldview is a Deep State plant or False Flag designed to make you look stupid. There is a wide spectrum of belief, even here on GAW.
A diversity of thought should not be threatening or suspicious, friend.
Yeah, I don’t have many other ways to explain this, so I will try to be very direct.
The outside world, including QHC, does not care about what is in the Q posts. The Q posts are not a threat to anybody.
What the outside world, and QHC, care about is what people who believe in Q believe in.
Which is not necessarily the same thing as a direct translation of Q.
Some people take literally what you assume to be disinformation by Q. Sometimes vice-versa. Some people have different motivations assigned to Trump’s vaccine support and build entire new theories based on that.
And some people who believe in Q have used Q’s philosophy to justify examining every other theory. Including lizard people. Why not? Could the Cabal not cover that up?
To be perfectly clear, Zeitreise, your theory on what Q “really meant” is one of thousands. And nobody else is less of a Q believer than you for finding different answers to Q’s questions, since Q never directly answered most of them.
If you’re refusing to accept that different, potentially valid conspiracies that Q may have revealed that you simply are unable to see, then you either believe yourself to be smarter than every other Q researcher alive, or you’re simply wrong.
So, are you the smartest researcher on this board, Zeitreise? Is there even a point in having a research board over any topic you’ve investigated?