Hey, I won’t assume you actually wanted an answer to this post since you were demonstrating how you would respond, but I am happy to type up a thing to this if you’re actually interested in discussing it.
I wasn’t intending to be pedantic, and apologize if that’s how I came off. I was simply asking if you were interested in a response or not. It’s not easy to read nuance in text.
It was hardly that word your tv taught you, nuance.
It was quite clear. But to help clear up your nuance, if i wanted to respond i'd have responded to you directly. As you can see above i was responding to another user, taking apart what you said, to help them (possibly others), to quickly identify bs, weak spots, and fallacies, and point out how there was nothing of value worth discussing or responding to, since ultimately it was a personal attack on a user here, adding nothing to the community.
Hey, I won’t assume you actually wanted an answer to this post since you were demonstrating how you would respond, but I am happy to type up a thing to this if you’re actually interested in discussing it.
But you assumed by replying even though when it was clear, and you noted, i was sating how i would respond.
I wasn’t intending to be pedantic, and apologize if that’s how I came off. I was simply asking if you were interested in a response or not. It’s not easy to read nuance in text.
It was hardly that word your tv taught you, nuance.
It was quite clear. But to help clear up your nuance, if i wanted to respond i'd have responded to you directly. As you can see above i was responding to another user, taking apart what you said, to help them (possibly others), to quickly identify bs, weak spots, and fallacies, and point out how there was nothing of value worth discussing or responding to, since ultimately it was a personal attack on a user here, adding nothing to the community.