exactly. And the word of the foremost scholars helps too. The best help you understand the translation in context. The mistake made by a lot of these crackpots is that they interpret things from a modern world view in total ignorance of the cultural norms of the time.
Well as a crackpot can I say I don't think a transcendental omnipotent omnipresent God would force you to hand over your first born to put through the fire..nor to be drinking six litres of fortified wine a day...nor demanding house of Jacob kill every man woman and child .when invading occupied lands ..nor forcing circumsion to tag his own!!
it's ok not to understand anything about the Bible, as these ideas you've quoted suggest. They are often referred to by people who don't understand the text and don't want to engage with the idea of an omnipotent being existing at all - no hate, by all means, it's a matter of choice. But wouldn't you want to know about it better before inventing ideas that simply cannot align with its premise?
I do understand about an transcendental omnipotent omnipresent God..and as mark biglino and other researchers say he is not in the Bible . The Jews did not have a word for god or eternity at that time
That's your interpretation...to research the Bible and see clearly the mistakes in it etc you need an old Hebrew Bible and the translation.
exactly. And the word of the foremost scholars helps too. The best help you understand the translation in context. The mistake made by a lot of these crackpots is that they interpret things from a modern world view in total ignorance of the cultural norms of the time.
Well as a crackpot can I say I don't think a transcendental omnipotent omnipresent God would force you to hand over your first born to put through the fire..nor to be drinking six litres of fortified wine a day...nor demanding house of Jacob kill every man woman and child .when invading occupied lands ..nor forcing circumsion to tag his own!!
But that's just me! Crackpot as you say
it's ok not to understand anything about the Bible, as these ideas you've quoted suggest. They are often referred to by people who don't understand the text and don't want to engage with the idea of an omnipotent being existing at all - no hate, by all means, it's a matter of choice. But wouldn't you want to know about it better before inventing ideas that simply cannot align with its premise?
I do understand about an transcendental omnipotent omnipresent God..and as mark biglino and other researchers say he is not in the Bible . The Jews did not have a word for god or eternity at that time