Koch's postulates are the conditions through which one would prove that a microorganism causes disease.
1 - The microorganism must be found in diseased but not healthy people.
2 - Must be cultured from the diseased individual
3 - Inoculation of a healthy individual should give the person the illness
4 - The microorganism must be re-isolated from the inoculated individual
That process would prove that the microorganism (virus) is the cause of the disease.
Worth noting, that even Propionibacterium acnes (P. acnes) (commonly acne) has not met these conditions.
Tell us you don't understand how the immune system works, without telling us you don't understand how the immune system works.
Look at the progression of what we call the common cold....
Person with runny nose, sore throat, small elevated temperature and cough is in contact with individual who doesn't have these symptoms.
That second individual FIRST develops a "tickle" in their nose, followed by a sore throat. They don't go automatically to a cough and light fever.
What does common sense tell you?
That nothing is making them sick?
No, it indicates that whatever is infecting them first resides in the part of the body which we use to take in outside oxygen....our nose and mouth. From there it starts to multiply, since our immune system can't fight infections outside the blood stream.
As we ingest the saliva from our mouth, during the day, it enters our body and the culture in our throat eventually makes it to our lungs.
I literally explained to you the process through which one would prove a causal relationship between a microorganism and the disease it causes.
Those postulates have NEVER been demonstrated for ANY virus at any time, over 100+ years, even with acne, something that was 'known' as the cause of pimples for a long time.
Common sense on this issue is carried over from what was 'common sense' in the later 1800s.
No, not 'nothing' making people sick as much as bacteria and viruses are not what we are told. The terrain theory places bacteria as a way to 'eat' dead cells so that toxicity doesn't' spread through the body. It also puts viruses as cells who were damaged and self-destruct which gives the appearance under a microscope of the virus 'blowing out' a contaminated cell.
This debate was going on in the time of Louis Pasteur, who argued that germs were infecting people and causing illness whereas the competing terrain theory was suggesting that bacteria and viruses cannot exist in a healthy environment and are actually part of the process of bringing the body back to a baseline.
Bro you don't need to tell us all that stuff. We KNOW the mainstream science, ok? We used to think the exact same thing as you. Telling us what we used to think, to dissuade us from the new knowledge that we've graduated to, is not going to "convince" us to come back down to kindergarten. We noticed a million contradictions in the mainstream theory that you have not yet noticed. But... maybe you soon will.
Koch's postulates are the conditions through which one would prove that a microorganism causes disease.
1 - The microorganism must be found in diseased but not healthy people. 2 - Must be cultured from the diseased individual 3 - Inoculation of a healthy individual should give the person the illness 4 - The microorganism must be re-isolated from the inoculated individual
That process would prove that the microorganism (virus) is the cause of the disease.
Worth noting, that even Propionibacterium acnes (P. acnes) (commonly acne) has not met these conditions.
Tell us you don't understand how the immune system works, without telling us you don't understand how the immune system works.
Look at the progression of what we call the common cold....
Person with runny nose, sore throat, small elevated temperature and cough is in contact with individual who doesn't have these symptoms.
That second individual FIRST develops a "tickle" in their nose, followed by a sore throat. They don't go automatically to a cough and light fever.
What does common sense tell you?
That nothing is making them sick?
No, it indicates that whatever is infecting them first resides in the part of the body which we use to take in outside oxygen....our nose and mouth. From there it starts to multiply, since our immune system can't fight infections outside the blood stream.
As we ingest the saliva from our mouth, during the day, it enters our body and the culture in our throat eventually makes it to our lungs.
I literally explained to you the process through which one would prove a causal relationship between a microorganism and the disease it causes.
Those postulates have NEVER been demonstrated for ANY virus at any time, over 100+ years, even with acne, something that was 'known' as the cause of pimples for a long time.
Common sense on this issue is carried over from what was 'common sense' in the later 1800s.
No, not 'nothing' making people sick as much as bacteria and viruses are not what we are told. The terrain theory places bacteria as a way to 'eat' dead cells so that toxicity doesn't' spread through the body. It also puts viruses as cells who were damaged and self-destruct which gives the appearance under a microscope of the virus 'blowing out' a contaminated cell.
This debate was going on in the time of Louis Pasteur, who argued that germs were infecting people and causing illness whereas the competing terrain theory was suggesting that bacteria and viruses cannot exist in a healthy environment and are actually part of the process of bringing the body back to a baseline.
Bro you don't need to tell us all that stuff. We KNOW the mainstream science, ok? We used to think the exact same thing as you. Telling us what we used to think, to dissuade us from the new knowledge that we've graduated to, is not going to "convince" us to come back down to kindergarten. We noticed a million contradictions in the mainstream theory that you have not yet noticed. But... maybe you soon will.