Was Michelle born a man, and did she have a sex change operation in 2008? As an investigative documentary reporter, I have to go where the facts lead me. The answer is emphatically no! Michelle was born female. Her voter registration as a male was likely a clerical error of some sort made when Michelle completed her 1994 voter registration form. She must have only noticed it in 2008 and corrected it appropriately.
This paragraph proves the "investigative journalist" in question is a fraud. They say "i have to go where the facts lead me!" Immediatly after uncovering the fact that big mike was listed as male in voter systems for YEARS they say its simply "a clerical error of some sort" without giving facts to back up that statement. So in the same sentence they both claim to follow only the facts and assert their opinion as reality. Fucking insanity
I disagree....IF a researcher had already determined Michelle was born a female then the idea of a clerical error in registration card makes sense.....
Wheres the fact to back it up? Even anecdotal evidence of a clerical error isnt provided. They just said theyre an investigative journalist after providing a bunch of docs proving big mike registered as a man but discredit it as an error based on their opinion that it must be an error?? What???
Youre the one missing the point. The author claims to be an investigative journalist who "follows the facts". They provide examples of big mike registering to vote as male. Thats fact. In the very next sentence they say, without showing any corroborating evidence, that it was likely a clerical error. Even the language they use proves its simply their opinion that the conclusion is based on.
What are you trying to say by asking "what is new?"
This paragraph proves the "investigative journalist" in question is a fraud. They say "i have to go where the facts lead me!" Immediatly after uncovering the fact that big mike was listed as male in voter systems for YEARS they say its simply "a clerical error of some sort" without giving facts to back up that statement. So in the same sentence they both claim to follow only the facts and assert their opinion as reality. Fucking insanity
I disagree....IF a researcher had already determined Michelle was born a female then the idea of a clerical error in registration card makes sense.....
Wheres the fact to back it up? Even anecdotal evidence of a clerical error isnt provided. They just said theyre an investigative journalist after providing a bunch of docs proving big mike registered as a man but discredit it as an error based on their opinion that it must be an error?? What???
You are missing the point....what is new?
Youre the one missing the point. The author claims to be an investigative journalist who "follows the facts". They provide examples of big mike registering to vote as male. Thats fact. In the very next sentence they say, without showing any corroborating evidence, that it was likely a clerical error. Even the language they use proves its simply their opinion that the conclusion is based on.
What are you trying to say by asking "what is new?"