Was Michelle born a man, and did she have a sex change operation in 2008? As an investigative documentary reporter, I have to go where the facts lead me. The answer is emphatically no! Michelle was born female. Her voter registration as a male was likely a clerical error of some sort made when Michelle completed her 1994 voter registration form. She must have only noticed it in 2008 and corrected it appropriately.
This paragraph proves the "investigative journalist" in question is a fraud. They say "i have to go where the facts lead me!" Immediatly after uncovering the fact that big mike was listed as male in voter systems for YEARS they say its simply "a clerical error of some sort" without giving facts to back up that statement. So in the same sentence they both claim to follow only the facts and assert their opinion as reality. Fucking insanity
Similar to when Barack's publisher had him listed as being born in Kenya for several years. That was just a clerical issue as well, right? Now, I don't know, or care, where he was actually born. I personally believe he invented the whole born in Kenya thing for street cred in Chicago. I mean had he told his voters he was from Hawaii, and raised by rich white folk, he wouldn't have been seen in the same light as someone born in the motherland. That, or he was actually born in Kenya. Either way, the man is a complete fraud, and that is all I need to know.
For real, at the begining im thinking "wow this is actually a good dig with info i hadnt seen before!" Then i read that paragraph. Then i read it again, then a third time to make sure i wasnt in the babylon bee. It genuinely reads as satire, the author is either joking or they have their head so far up their ass it loops twice.
Was going to post the same point! This tells me the DS/left wants to run Michael and they need to get the story out that he doesn’t have a dick. Too late Joan told us and her death confirmed.
I disagree....IF a researcher had already determined Michelle was born a female then the idea of a clerical error in registration card makes sense.....
Wheres the fact to back it up? Even anecdotal evidence of a clerical error isnt provided. They just said theyre an investigative journalist after providing a bunch of docs proving big mike registered as a man but discredit it as an error based on their opinion that it must be an error?? What???
Youre the one missing the point. The author claims to be an investigative journalist who "follows the facts". They provide examples of big mike registering to vote as male. Thats fact. In the very next sentence they say, without showing any corroborating evidence, that it was likely a clerical error. Even the language they use proves its simply their opinion that the conclusion is based on.
What are you trying to say by asking "what is new?"
This paragraph proves the "investigative journalist" in question is a fraud. They say "i have to go where the facts lead me!" Immediatly after uncovering the fact that big mike was listed as male in voter systems for YEARS they say its simply "a clerical error of some sort" without giving facts to back up that statement. So in the same sentence they both claim to follow only the facts and assert their opinion as reality. Fucking insanity
Similar to when Barack's publisher had him listed as being born in Kenya for several years. That was just a clerical issue as well, right? Now, I don't know, or care, where he was actually born. I personally believe he invented the whole born in Kenya thing for street cred in Chicago. I mean had he told his voters he was from Hawaii, and raised by rich white folk, he wouldn't have been seen in the same light as someone born in the motherland. That, or he was actually born in Kenya. Either way, the man is a complete fraud, and that is all I need to know.
I stopped reading at that paragraph and immediately came here to see who else actually read it. Good on you.
For real, at the begining im thinking "wow this is actually a good dig with info i hadnt seen before!" Then i read that paragraph. Then i read it again, then a third time to make sure i wasnt in the babylon bee. It genuinely reads as satire, the author is either joking or they have their head so far up their ass it loops twice.
The author doesn't want to get Joaned.
Was going to post the same point! This tells me the DS/left wants to run Michael and they need to get the story out that he doesn’t have a dick. Too late Joan told us and her death confirmed.
I disagree....IF a researcher had already determined Michelle was born a female then the idea of a clerical error in registration card makes sense.....
Wheres the fact to back it up? Even anecdotal evidence of a clerical error isnt provided. They just said theyre an investigative journalist after providing a bunch of docs proving big mike registered as a man but discredit it as an error based on their opinion that it must be an error?? What???
Agreed. There is no investigation here. This is completely an opinion piece and a book review.
Exactly what it is.
You are missing the point....what is new?
Youre the one missing the point. The author claims to be an investigative journalist who "follows the facts". They provide examples of big mike registering to vote as male. Thats fact. In the very next sentence they say, without showing any corroborating evidence, that it was likely a clerical error. Even the language they use proves its simply their opinion that the conclusion is based on.
What are you trying to say by asking "what is new?"