Do you see the building with the word 'alamy' on it, above the WTC 1 & 2 derbis? That and the building to the right are severely damaged but still stood. Why did the building right above it collapse neatly into its own footprint, (wtc7) and the building to the left and right of it remain standing?
The fact is, WT7 is the smoking gun for controlled demolition, and even if it had been damaged by falling debris, it would not have fallen straight down into its own footprint because the support furthest away from the collapse couldn't have been weakened in such a way that it would fall straight down like a controlled demolition.
Let me rephrase it:
How is it logical to think WTC7 fell due to damage from WTC1/2, when the supports along barclay street of WTC7 wouldn't have been impacted?
How do you logically get a building falling straight down with supports still in place?
At any rate, the Univertity of Alaska Fairbanks has done some great research on wtc7 and they have indicated the claimed cause (fire) did not cause the collapse. https://ine.uaf.edu/wtc7
Take a look at this photo:
https://c7.alamy.com/comp/CWB8XY/world-trade-center-aerial-photograph-of-the-world-trade-center-taken-CWB8XY.jpg
Do you see the building with the word 'alamy' on it, above the WTC 1 & 2 derbis? That and the building to the right are severely damaged but still stood. Why did the building right above it collapse neatly into its own footprint, (wtc7) and the building to the left and right of it remain standing?
The fact is, WT7 is the smoking gun for controlled demolition, and even if it had been damaged by falling debris, it would not have fallen straight down into its own footprint because the support furthest away from the collapse couldn't have been weakened in such a way that it would fall straight down like a controlled demolition.
Let me rephrase it: How is it logical to think WTC7 fell due to damage from WTC1/2, when the supports along barclay street of WTC7 wouldn't have been impacted?
How do you logically get a building falling straight down with supports still in place?
At any rate, the Univertity of Alaska Fairbanks has done some great research on wtc7 and they have indicated the claimed cause (fire) did not cause the collapse. https://ine.uaf.edu/wtc7
That's a better picture. But why aren't you answering the question and deflecting? this is shilling behaviour.
see: https://greatawakening.win/p/15IrBTtPqz/x/c/4Ob8JwLyjpo
can't you answer the question you were initially asked?