The Antichrist is a clown.
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nazi_persecution_of_the_Catholic_Church_in_Poland
I thought the Nazis didn't kill anybody. You people are disgusting. Hitler was a catholic, Hitler admired the murders committed by the catholic "church."
https://alphahistory.com/nazigermany/the-nazi-catholic-concordat-1933/
The Antichrist cometh, and he lies like his father lies.
You're the only individual I've ever seen make this Roman Catholic claim. I've never seen this anywhere else, in anything I've read or watched.
Where do you think the idea of a "thousand year" Reich came from?
Revelation 20:4 - And I saw thrones, and they sat upon them, and judgment was given unto them: and I saw the souls of them that were beheaded for the witness of Jesus, and for the word of God, and which had not worshipped the beast, neither his image, neither had received his mark upon their foreheads, or in their hands; and they lived and reigned with Christ a thousand years.
The roman catholics believe that they usher in the thousand year reign of Christ on Earth, it is doctrine that they teach. They believe that God has rejected the nation of Israel forever. And that the catholic church has replaced Israel as God's chosen people. The catholics have been killing Jews since they became catholics, the crusades, inquisitions, Holy Wars, World War 2. Why was Rommel headed directly for Jerusalem? Who was among Germany's allies, aside from the muslims and Japan? Italy. Who made a Concordant with the vatican in 1933? Hitler.
Maybe you don't know this but the roman catholics still covet Jerusalem. They've spent the last 70 years surrounding it with Israel's sworn enemies using their United Nations. You think they'll let the Jews live if they get control?
Of course they rewrite history, so they can repeat it.
As for the rest of it, what's the point in refuting lies that you firmly believe without seeing the reality all around you? One movie.
The "one movie" is a twelve and-a-half-hour long docu-series. If you're calling it a "movie," perhaps you haven't watched it?
What I meant when I said I knew nothing of the Catholic Church, was any connection to the Third Reich. We've already discussed what I think about the concordant. It simply allowed the Church "free passage" to operate as it had without crossing German command.
Crusades, inquisitions, etc., were not against Jews in particular. They were to convert all whom the Church felt were heathens. In reality, there was nothing religious about them at all -- it was simply an expansion by the greatest power at that time. There were crusades all over northern Europe, England, and the Middle East. No one was safe.
Here's something to consider, when you say that Roman Catholics covet Jerusalem. Are you aware that Jesuits are not Catholics? The Jesuits infiltrated The Vatican over a century ago, all the way up to the current Pope. Perhaps the fact that you feel they "covet" Jerusalem, is actually evidence of a bigger plan in operation? There is some intelligence that a tunnel exists from The Vatican to Israel...
perhaps you haven't watched it?
I watched the first two episodes until I could no longer stand it. This was after they used a photo of Ukrainian SS killing Jews in Russia and lied saying it was "ethnic Germans" being killed by Polish soldiers. If you zoom in on the weapon being used by the "Polish soldier," you'll notice that it is a German Walther PP. Standard issue of the SS.
was any connection to the Third Reich
The First Reich was the Holy Roman Empire (the Holy Roman Empire of the German Nation, Heiliges Römisches Reich deutscher Nation, not the ancient Roman Empire), 800 - 1806. Charlemagne (Charles the Great) was crowned emperor by Pope Leo III in Rome on Christmas Day 800,
https://www.axishistory.com/various/125-germany-unsorted/germany-unsorted/4865-the-first-a-second-reich
Interesting fun fact, Hitlers Austrian Nazi party card had the number 555 on it, antiChrist is 666. Charlemangne was 333 and Napoleon was 444. Nimrod111 and Nero222.
Crusades, inquisitions, etc., were not against Jews in particular. They were to convert all whom the Church felt were heathens.
In the years 500-1500 the Jews, as a religious and a cultural minority, were often preyed upon by the Christian majority in a familiar sociological pattern. The papal record is consistently mixed. Harsh infringements of Jewish rights are censured at the same time that restrictions are imposed on their full participation in society. The vocabulary of guilt for Jesus’ crucifixion and charges of stubbornness and blindness recur.
https://www.ushmm.org/research/about-the-mandel-center/initiatives/ethics-religion-holocaust/articles-and-resources/christian-persecution-of-jews-over-the-centuries/christian-persecution-of-jews-over-the-centuries
These are just drops in the bucket.
The Jesuits infiltrated The Vatican over a century ago
This is just cover for their lies, a scapegoat. Just like "vatican 2" is cover for their lies. The roots of this disease go back to the Tower of Babel, Babylon.
I don't recall the specific photo you mention, but I do recall that the series spent quite a bit of time presenting photos from Stalin's "Torch Man Order," where German uniforms and weapons were taken from the dead or prisoners, and used for propaganda purposes. (Although, I see from my index I created of the series that Order #0428 was not covered in the first two episodes.) Is it possible that you are mistaken what the intent was of the photo described?
Also, the Ukrainian SS forces, led by Stepan Bandera, bore little resemblance to German command. In fact, Hitler was known to have traveled to speak to Bandera, telling him to "cool it." The Ukrainian SS is ruthlessly racist, as it is today -- known by a different name. The series didn't cover this part of WWII very well, and I can see the possibility for inaccuracies and/or confusion.
I watch documentaries on TV all the time, and frequently see things not true or misrepresented. I don't disqualify the whole documentary because of something I disagree with, or know to be false. There are still things to be learned, or appreciated. Perhaps you might reconsider your initial reaction to what you deemed to be untrue, and give it a second look?
Is it possible that you are mistaken what the intent was of the photo described?
Dude, I have bookshelves full of "holocaust" documentation. For 65 years, that photo was attributed to the Nazis. Only this movie attributed it to the overwhelming world super power of Poland. Tiny little Poland provoked the German Empire? That movie is ridiculous. I suppose the Sudetenland was fixing to make war on the German Empire before Germany cut them to pieces, right?
Also, the Ukrainian SS forces, led by Stepan Bandera, bore little resemblance to German command. In fact, Hitler was known to have traveled to speak to Bandera, telling him to "cool it."
Prove this, without citing your movie.