I knew something was fishy when she lost. There was a Republican Senator on the primary who also lost that seemed like he would have won (he campaigned against voter fraud).
I hope this goes somewhere, but 2 points:
Why should it cost $200,000 to ensure the democratic process works?
Who is in charge of the recount? Is it the democrat Jena Griswold who doesn't like Tina Peters and will have to campaign against her?
I knew something was fishy when she lost. There was a Republican Senator on the primary who also lost that seemed like he would have won (he campaigned against voter fraud).
I hope this goes somewhere, but 2 points:
Why should it cost $200,000 to ensure the democratic process works?
Who is in charge of the recount? Is it the democrat Jena Griswold who doesn't like Tina Peters and will have to campaign against her?