When DJT made air q's during the rallies in 2018, 2019, they were crystal clear. The circle, completed, and then the dash, a downstroke at 45 degree angle.
The gesture here is very similar to another gesture he commonly uses, which is the inclusive "O". A circle, completed, and then sometimes followed with a point to the people, as is done here. It's a gesture saying "all of you, you!" It's an acknowledgment of the people he's looking at.
In the footage from the 2018, 2019 rallies, his air Q's were in clear response to Q signs in the crowd. Like Baby Q, or the building Q presence at the rallies. It was a direct acknowledgement of that Q presence, as displayed by the Q pedes and the Q signs and t-shirts. Like, "oh, there's mah Q peeps. Q"
If this is the 'clearest air q' you've seen, were you following in 2018/19? Because there were some very, crystal clear Qs at that time. There was a whole thing going on, where the Q presence goty bigger and bigger, and DJT's team decided to stop folks from wearing Q t-shirts in or Q signs, to sort of keep a lid on the thing. Q discussed this during that whole period on the board with anons.
Here, who is DJT gesturing to, and what? Unless it was baby Q or a Q t shirt or a bunch of Q pedes, I'd say the basis for describing this as an air Q are flimsy.
Call me a skeptic, but I think pedes want so much to see the air Qs, that they read into it too much.
Q+ has certainly done some hefty air q's, but I don't see it in this one.
Os don't tend to have the embellishment of the little curly that is clearly visible in this.
Take your sarcastic "And yes, my apologies for applying logic, reasoning..." And shove it deep up your ass, assuming you still have room, seeing as you seem to already be up your own ass. Thanks.
soz. i don't see it.
When DJT made air q's during the rallies in 2018, 2019, they were crystal clear. The circle, completed, and then the dash, a downstroke at 45 degree angle.
Like this one from earlier this year:
https://rumble.com/v136y76-donald-trump-air-q-may-1-2022-rally-in-greenwood-nebraska.html
The gesture here is very similar to another gesture he commonly uses, which is the inclusive "O". A circle, completed, and then sometimes followed with a point to the people, as is done here. It's a gesture saying "all of you, you!" It's an acknowledgment of the people he's looking at.
In the footage from the 2018, 2019 rallies, his air Q's were in clear response to Q signs in the crowd. Like Baby Q, or the building Q presence at the rallies. It was a direct acknowledgement of that Q presence, as displayed by the Q pedes and the Q signs and t-shirts. Like, "oh, there's mah Q peeps. Q"
If this is the 'clearest air q' you've seen, were you following in 2018/19? Because there were some very, crystal clear Qs at that time. There was a whole thing going on, where the Q presence goty bigger and bigger, and DJT's team decided to stop folks from wearing Q t-shirts in or Q signs, to sort of keep a lid on the thing. Q discussed this during that whole period on the board with anons.
Here, who is DJT gesturing to, and what? Unless it was baby Q or a Q t shirt or a bunch of Q pedes, I'd say the basis for describing this as an air Q are flimsy.
Call me a skeptic, but I think pedes want so much to see the air Qs, that they read into it too much.
Q+ has certainly done some hefty air q's, but I don't see it in this one.
...are you blind?
Apparently.
At any rate, I've seen air Q's 100x clearer than this. I mean, if there is room for doubt, I tend to err on the side of doubt.
And yes, my apologies for applying logic, reasoning, context and analysis. Sorry if my results don't agree with yours.
How would YOU distinguish between the inclusive circle gestures DJT does and air Qs?
Os don't tend to have the embellishment of the little curly that is clearly visible in this.
Take your sarcastic "And yes, my apologies for applying logic, reasoning..." And shove it deep up your ass, assuming you still have room, seeing as you seem to already be up your own ass. Thanks.
Your first comment was seemed pretty antagonistic, for someone just sharing a view.
Your follow up comment seems to confirm it.
But, either way, mea culpa. The sarcastic remark was probably uncalled for. But I'll leave the discussion at this point.
I see it as more of a capital cursive Q.
Hmmmm.... Interesting.