Maybe the importance of the first arrest in 3716 and 3717 is not who gets arrested, but who is making the arrest, or the charges they face. A civilian must violate the Law of War to be tried within the Military System. Who makes the arrest for a Law of War violation? - The Great Awakening

264

Maybe the importance of the first arrest in 3716 and 3717 is not who gets arrested, but who is making the arrest, or the charges they face. A civilian must violate the Law of War to be tried within the Military System. Who makes the arrest for a Law of War violation? 🗣️ DISCUSSION 💬

posted 2 years ago by TSearch 2 years ago by TSearch +264 / -0

Going back to post 619 the expectation is set that trying top level NWO/DS operatives in civilian courts would be pointless. The alternative not stated explicitly would be Military Tribunals.

https://qposts.online/?q=619&s=postnum

Post 2523 and 2583 are more explicit and talks about the charge of being an unlawful enemy combatant. It discusses an exchange between Lindsey Graham and then Judge Kavanaugh on the topic. And tribunals.

https://qposts.online/?q=2523&s=postnum

https://qposts.online/?q=2583&s=postnum

Then we end up with 3716 and 3717 identical posts. Who is charged under sealed indictment and who is first arrested may not be as important as what the charges are and who is taking them into custody. The door has to be opened on Law of War violations for Military Tribunals to be used. Maybe what we should be looking for is the first charge of being an unlawful enemy combatant.

https://qposts.online/?q=3716&s=postnum

https://qposts.online/?q=3717&s=postnum

72 comments

72 comments share save hide report block hide replies

To The Great Awakening

We are researchers who deal in open-source information, reasoned argument, and dank memes. We do battle in the sphere of ideas and ideas only. We neither need nor condone the use of force in our work here. WE ARE THE PUBLIC FACE OF Q. OUR MISSION IS TO RED-PILL NORMIES.

This is a pro-Q community. Please read and respect our rules below before contributing.

WHY Q?

"Those who cannot understand that we cannot simply start arresting w/o first: ensuring the safety & well-being of the population shifting the narrative removing those in DC through resignation to ensure success defeating ISIS/MS13 to prevent fail-safes freezing assets to remove network-to-network abilities kill off COC to prevent top-down comms/org, etc. etc. should not be participating in discussions." Q

Comments (72)

sorted by:

▲ 4 ▼

– Teapot_Gravy 4 points 2 years ago +4 / -0

In March 2018 GEOTUS signed an executive order amending the manual for court martials. The 636-page annex orders that all U.S. civilians shall be subject to military justice and that the military will be able to hire non-military legal experts to help with tribunals.

Page 2 describes military jurisdiction as: “A government temporarily governing the civil population within its territory or a portion of its territory through its military forces as necessity may require.”