When I first tried to edit Wikipedia it was a real punch to the gut to learn you cannot reference primary sources.
Have a link to a study? Not allowed. Link to a government document or report? Not allowed. Link to a local paper? Not allowed.
The only sources you're allowed to reference are the major newspapers, which are entirely broken and corrupt. If all the sources are corrupt, what does it say about all the info on Wikipedia?
I took a journalism course in college around 2012. It was sad the amount of people trying to use Wikipedia in college to use as a source when we had published books in our library on campus. I don’t even go to Wikipedia for any sourcing, and google uses it as their top reference.
When I first tried to edit Wikipedia it was a real punch to the gut to learn you cannot reference primary sources.
Have a link to a study? Not allowed. Link to a government document or report? Not allowed. Link to a local paper? Not allowed.
The only sources you're allowed to reference are the major newspapers, which are entirely broken and corrupt. If all the sources are corrupt, what does it say about all the info on Wikipedia?
Big red pill moment for me.
Try https://wikispooks.com
I took a journalism course in college around 2012. It was sad the amount of people trying to use Wikipedia in college to use as a source when we had published books in our library on campus. I don’t even go to Wikipedia for any sourcing, and google uses it as their top reference.