Reading an article about a company that put graphene in cement to lay concrete floors had me wondering is this the same graphene (graphene oxide) they were putting into the vaxxines, because of the name of course but also the images of the graphene in the article. They looked just like the hexagonal honeycomb lattice type pattern as we've seen of what is in the vaxxines.
So, I started searching Graphene vs Graphene Oxide.
The website (Graphene and Graphene Oxide Basics) that really got my attention (linked below in this post) was about "Graphene Micromotors" & "Nanotubes", there are short videos about these.
I need your help frens to see if any of this actually means anything or is connected. I'm not exactly a brainiac, so some of this stuff may be beyond me.
Article:
How graphene's superpowers could soon be unleashed
https://www.bbc.com/news/business-61913871
~~Graphene vs Graphene Oxide:
Understanding Graphene
https://www.graphenea.com/pages/graphene#.YuS_Bj3MKUk
Graphene
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Graphene
Graphene Oxide
https://www.sciencedirect.com/topics/chemistry/graphene-oxide
What is the Difference Between Graphene Oxide and Reduced Graphene Oxide
https://nanografi.com/blog/what-is-the-difference-between-graphene-oxide-and-reduced-graphene-oxide/
~~This last link has some videos that surprised me, because I have never seen this stuff before.
Graphene and Graphene Oxide Basics
I didn't watch the first long video, but I scrolled down the page a short ways to find 2 other short ones that are interesting.
https://www.holistichealthonline.info/graphene-oxide-basics/
***Researchers doing experiments with something called "Graphene Micromotors".
Discovered in 2004 when researchers at University of Manchester isolated a single plane of graphite (graphene) using a kind of scotch tape. This 2D material revealed properties that lend to a number of applications in electronics, remote sensing, medicine, quantum computing:
It is stronger than diamond yet flexible and transparent
Graphene conducts heat and electricity and superconductor efficiencies!
Its electronic properties make it highly sensitive to the absorption of molecules such as CO, NO, NO2, and NH3. Research has indicated that this sensitivity can be increased by 100 fold with addition of Boron.
Graphene has made possible the development of electron-spin based quantum computing. Many types of graphene components are in development to test various quantum computing qubit models.
Water filtration and purification (highly absorbant used in oil spill cleanups at only a fraction of the weight)
Revolutionary supercapacitor technology and antimicrobial devices using laser etching fabrication
Strengthen different composites including human bone implants
Magnetically-driven nano-scale human bio-sensor and graphene micro-motor drug delivery researchâvideo âGraphene micromotors spin forwardâ
***Another set of researchers experimenting with "Nanotubes"
"Strongly electrically and mechanically reactive to external electrostatic and RF radiation (Teslaphoresis)video âNanotubes assemble rice introduces Teslaphoresisâ
What are the Applications of Graphene and Graphene Oxide?
Water filtration
Covalent functionalization (drugs, polymers, fluorescent tags)
Bio-devices, biosensors, human tissue scaffolds, drug delivery and gene therapy vectors
Energy Storage for ultracapacitors and batteries cathode/dielectric interface
Enhanced fluid separation for passive porous membrane filters
Claimed GO shows excellent DNA absorption properties and âbiocompatiblityâ. DNA binding to GO is found to be very stable and reversible. (conflicting studies)
Graphene Oxide is the main ingredient used in Hydrogels. Hydrogels are developed by DARPA and used in the Covid Vaccines
A Military-Funded Biosensor Could Be the Future of Pandemic Detection
(Bookmarking for now) I have high hopes for graphene and just heard of graphene oxide b/c of the vaccines. Some woman claims graphene oxide R&D is to interface human with computers. She thinks the mandatory vax is an experiment to see how much they can dose us before killing over.
Apparantly hemp could provide us with a nano lattice that is as good as graphene.
https://phys.org/news/2014-08-hemp-nanosheets-topple-graphene-ideal.html
Not reading all of this (TLDR), but my first thought was: This stuff is inside billions of people. They are developing long strong blood clots, or more correctly, long strong clots of SOMETHING. It is and will be killing them over time. It's probably due to the graphene from the vaxx.
Did you watch the two short videos (not the first long video, but the 2 below it)? One video âGraphene micromotors spin forwardâ & the other video âNanotubes assemble rice introduces Teslaphoresisâ?
https://www.holistichealthonline.info/graphene-oxide-basics/
"Graphene Oxide is the main ingredient used in Hydrogels." Now that is nonsense. See Wikipedia on hydrogels. So the source article is hyped-up rubbish pretending to be talking science.
Anyway. Too much hype. It's still too expensive for any widespread use.
But it keeps the career of a huge number of academics going. More than anything. It's like fusion research -- it'll be the greatest thing in 10 years' time, haha.
For example, anything graphene filtration thing will need a single piece of single layer graphene to be isolated and applied to a holder. Manually done for academic experiments. Now, try tooling a factory to make filter units like that in an assembly line... not going to happen.
I don't believe there is graphene or its oxide in the jabs. The spike protein generated is toxic enough already. But jab batches are wildly different on VAERS, some batches were downright dangerous, so I would not rule out contamination or sabotage in some batches. But graphene? Nah, it's like those magnetic jabbed arms we saw way back, and nobody is talking about those now.
There is a lot of noise, some may be outright disinformation, and I would hesitate to be too trustful of anything or anyone.
Its graphene hydroxide that is the problem.
https://files.catbox.moe/q61l7p.mp4
This researcher was dead hours after posting this video showing the results of what he found in the vaxx. RIP Sir.
Thanks, I appreciate your going out of the way to show this.
I hope other folks can corroborate this. For your information, I had experienced the onslaught of people going ape about magnetic arms or jab areas early in the WIN site history. Folks going so apeshit that some of us are bad people to even question the veracity of the videos. Now, nobody talks about those magnets anymore. Nothing. Zero. Totally gone. Like it never happened.
So of course I must maintain a skeptical stance. A few things:
(1) If people are being cut from the inside, why have we not seen more bruising cases? Bloot clots are a huge problem, but that doesn't require anything to cut the body, because the clots are in the blood vessel. No cuts necessary, just clotting. But say bruising? Nothing in mainstream research papers. All we have to go on is just his picture.
(2) If he is so great a researcher, why doesn't he have any picture of graphene or its oxide or its hydroxide sample of any kind? Nothing. Also totally zero. He could have got a high quality graphite block, exfoliated some flakes, get some single layers, then use NaOH to make graphene hydroxide. Don't need a special lab. But, nothing!
(3) A picture of a carbon brake disk, but no actual spectrograph plot showing the graphene oxide bond or a comparison with graphene etc? Pretty bare for a hot-shot academic who claim he is a big shot in this area in Europe. Even if he cannot share company work, there is a truckload of open-access papers with pictures that he can use.
(4) Even claims he cut himself on paper infused with those super sharp graphene hydroxide. No pictures? No demonstration? Hmmm. He say so much about all that bleeding, but nothing to show the world? No one else has demo'ed this? Only his word, and he has nothing but his word? Heck, one can even buy a bit of graphene from a supplier like Sigma Aldrich and then use NaOH to get graphene hydroxide. Then he will have plenty to demonstrate how it can make his hand bleed like hell.
Extraordinary claims. But his credibility is lacking. Note that I am not applying feelings on this; (1) to (4) are totally reasonable technical issues. So there.
I would say that it would explain all the super fit athletes dying, the blood pumping all the sharp hydroxide particle at high speeds through the heart?
If its fake then why was he killed just hours after he put this online? And he was.
I think it will be quite hard to convince you to be less trusting of such things.
Are there second sources for this? Or just someone on Youtube saying such and such? Plenty of YT people are there to make money. I went through the magnets on arms thing, pushed back with reasoned discussion. People were absolutely convinced the vids were 100% solid evidence. Like, dead sure. And I was a bad person to even question the sincerity of those who pushed the vids.
The least credible thing was his saying that he cut his hand on the (charred?) paper with graphene hydroxide on it. Bleeding. It's a super easy thing to demo. Look for scientific supplies. You can get all the stuff easily. Pretty cheap too, as far as such supplies go. He had nothing but crappy presentation material. No demo. I have an Engineering degree. He does not look or act like a hotshot EU researcher. Boasting is not credible. Anyone can boast. Remember, all his presentation stuff can be found on the Internet. Anyone with a STEM degree will have huge problems with it, if they are observant and honest with themselves.
Clots are inside the blood vessels. Don't need cuts at all. Draw a diagram if you can't picture it. Just need a toxic protein to clot the blood. No cuts. Athletes will circulate the mRNA from the arm muscle jab location to all over their body, generating too much of the toxic protein. Plenty of jab adverse effects papers and nothing about bruising or bleeding due to micro-cuts.
Trust that graphene vid? Uh, not me. Real life is not a fairy tale castle. Plenty of folks will do anything to monetize Youtube. Youtube is the wild west. Con games abound, to drive up views and hence, ad money.
If you are young, then please, learn the real world. If you are not into STEM, then read about the stuff. Then you will understand. Don't trust too fast.
If its fake then why was he murdered?
Unless there is a second source, I cannot trust a single vid. No matter what they say. Who cares if their puppy died, you know? Even Youtubers can be misled. Is there a second source reporting his murder? A newspaper mention? Often for such stuff, journalism standards require a second independent source. Facts must actually be found to be facts by way of a credible or reliable second source.
Remember, he claims to be a big shot graphene researcher. Should be easy enough to find an obituary in that research field. If you are a big shot top researcher, you must know a huge number of other researchers, and so his death should be very well known to a large number of such researcher.
Kory, McCullogh, Malone, Kirsch, Berenson, none of the most careful researchers and bloggers on COVID are talking about graphene.
More food for thought below. Think. Think before you trust anything.
(1) Well before blood vessels are damaged due to so-called micro-cuts, blood cells will have already been totally devastated. But I have seen no such reports of such things on TDW or GAW. Untold millions of blood tests and no damage to blood cells but he says blood vessels are cut? The fellow is not credible.
(2) If blood vessels are really damaged, then it would show up as bruising at certain areas. Strangulation will burst blood vessels too, and often bruising will show, often around the eyes. There are no reports of such cases. The picture he showed was likely deliberately blurred, and it is probably copied from a book of failed plastic surgery cases. The fellow has zero credibility.
Anyway I really can't be bothered if such iffy people are alive or dead.
Best if you think for yourself. Critical thinking. I would prefer not to drag this on and on and on, you know. At some point, you need to figure it out yourself.
And the boobies on the victim look funny. A jokey UK IT rag used to call them "flotation devices". Real boobs that big will hang down and down and...
Boob jobs gone bad may end up with necrosis of tissue. Part of the flesh die and the boobs will look like shit. He may have got it out of a book on plastic surgery, from a pirate book site. Easy peasy.