i'll entertain your accusations once you prove you're not a shill, programmed to narrowly focus on a single point that q mentioned 4 times in almost 5,000 drops. none of which talk about the founding fathers and other important figures in western civ being masons. I don't think that q really saw the need to defend the founders for some reason.
i will freely admit the possibility that you're not a shill, and instead suffer from a monomanaical form of mental illness or you're just a garden variety internet debate addict desperately in need of attention.
i'll entertain your accusations once you prove you're not a shill, programmed to narrowly focus on a single point that q mentioned 4 times in almost 5,000 drops. none of which talk about the founding fathers and other important figures in western civ being masons. I don't think that q really saw the need to defend the founders for some reason.
i will freely admit the possibility that you're not a shill, and instead suffer from a monomanaical form of mental illness or you're just a garden variety internet debate addict desperately in need of attention.
Ad homonym attacks are ineffective on me.
Why haven’t you responded to my questions? Mason.