Just a request: can we sunset the word fags here, replace with lads? Here's why
(media.greatawakening.win)
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
Comments (95)
sorted by:
You are mistaken. If he had a bunch of people downvoting you, you'd be way under water already. I just see one or two.
That said, you are mistaken in your premise. Being irreverent and freewheeling has a function totally independent of semantic connotations. Nobody cares a ton about preserving the -fag suffix, but everybody cares about, and rejects, calls to police ourselves or be policed.
Yep, that about sums it up.
Then he outed himself as a literal Nazi.
I am.
Now what? :)
You sure are deleting a lot of your comments. Are you realizing that you've lost and throwing in the towel?
Repost that one about my fake wife! I didn't get to read it before your inner jew popped up and censored you!
I've deleted not one comment. Those are your friends. To the contrary, one of my friends over in Missouri has been faithfully trying to upvote my comments but you and others keep voting them down. Look to right of ratio and stop being a twat.
In fact I'll downvote you now just to show you. Check your ratio. THAT is what is happening, and it ain't me, buster. I'm on the right.
The right believes truth requires no censorship.
You're a sick gay jew and you really want my attention bad.
Here's your last (you), (((you))). Good night.
Nothing at all.
You're entitled to your beliefs, even if you don't allow others to express theirs.
I can't resist :)
(Cries out as he strikes you)
Eh. I almost can go with this. But I think you're mistaken. I believe words matter, and though calls to police ourselves or be police are rightfully noggish and should be rejected, we also don't need to allow meta misuse of words, a favorite communist tactic, to take any hold here. You're like a person ignoring that smoke can kill arguing in favor of allowing an enemy who likes to use smoke to suffocate people and uses it often to continue using it here. Leftists use words as weapons. This isn't random. Words WORK. Repeated use of negative words subtly brands and influences the thoughts and behavior of the used upon. And if so-called gen x actual boomer really did have muh five kids with an Aryan goddess, which it has claimed, he would know this.
When you repeatedly tell your kid he is a bad person because White, or because male, he will begin to think he is bad and behave in worse ways. So why does this magically not apply to making anons call eachother homosexual, even as a joke?
Answer that.
Also answer this: does our zog nog friend here also deny that the left repeatedly calling his own noggish people thugs and criminals in their own stupid fucking rap singles made nogs worse over time until it became a self-prophecy?
Well? Are words not important? Is this one magically not important? If so, why not?
Answer the question.
Meaning is always more important than words, as words exist to impart meaning and the reverse is not true. Nearly all words have multiple meanings, and none are devoid of context. Therefore you should not insist on any word being exclusively what you want, especially when most of the discussion uses a different meaning.
Sorry, I'm on another thread now