I have begun release of Part 2 of my report: Welcome To The Machine.
The first part of that release is found on Superstonk. If you could go upvote it just so it gets to more people I would really appreciate it.
However, the real post is on the website I made for it.
Part 1 is a revised version of a report I made last year that shows all companies are one company.
Part 2 is going to do that and more. It is a normie Red-Pill though, and designed to make it past Superstonk censors (I hope) so it takes a direct approach to the problem through the corporate world. I show how the world was created. I show how The Matrix was created.
What I have up so far (sections 4 and 5) does not do that quite yet. That is about the first 1/3 of my report. Hopefully section 6 will be done in a couple weeks. Each section increases the scope of the problem, allowing people to see the evidence without rejecting it due to cognitive dissonance. At least that is how it is supposed to work. We shall see.
If you are interested, it shows a whole lot that not many people know. It represents a few thousand hours of research over the past year and a half or so. I believe the details of the nature of our world are important, and it gets into the details.
If you are interested in Economics (almost all of life's decisions are economic), or the way the world we live in was constructed, what that means, and what the solution to the conundrum is, I humbly suggest my report will be covering that. What I have up so far doesn't quite get there yet, but it makes a proper start.
Thanks for reading.
Awesome super excited to check this out! Very inspiring also I am working on something similar to this report in my own day to day right now. Its more of a loose framework and explores the same ideas and backstory but I'm coming at it from the lens of history and culture. The world events that would tie in next to your economic history; sort of upstream from it.
I am anxious to sit down with a coffee and read through this to see where my own notes and research might join up. I studied Economics (more Micro though; but I've always had a better knack for understanding Macro and Money and Banking class was a particular passion of mine.... had a great instructor for that course too he was a Economics Ph.D. who actually went to testify for some stuff on Capitol Hill that ended up being part of the Dodd-Frank bill... we also had a guy from University of Chicago that was there during Milton Friedman's time... not bad for a state university system satellite campus! Just as good as SUNY and a hell of a lot cheaper)
So I'm coming into this blind I have no knowledge of any work of yours before now but I'll be anxious to read and react! Do you have anything on your site where we can comment or contact you? Idk why I'm asking but just if I can contribute something to help... I can give technical expertise such as like showing examples of a credit default swap in math or 1st derivatives in a one or two variable equation (i.e. how they set up MBS securities) statistics w confidence intervals, history of the money supply stuff, fed funds rate and exchange rate determinism.... all the complex ways they screw us, but shown in maths, y'know.
A lot of their wickedness in fact can be taken all the way back to a simple supply and demand graph. When you have satisfied all the micro conditions (perfect information, normal good or service, normal demand, utility and elasticity all being equal, all buyers and sellers proper economic agents, etc.) our system gives perfect competition.... I feel like people just have a "knowing" sense of this like its innate. We just kind of expect any certain thing to cost a certain amount, and that price expectation is borne put in the process of finding value through simple S&D graph. What they do to muck it all up is by government intervention in markets either with regulations or by becoming an economic actor themselves in the market. Setting these price floors and price ceilings is what makes our system so inefficient and it can be shown again and again in everything from the U.S. labor market to prices on all normal goods to the federal reserve intervention on money supply and circulation to more exotic instruments like medical insurance. It's always market inefficiency created by government intervention under the guise of social net benefit increases outweighing something or the lies of markets being inefficient at something like (price discovery) without governance adding "rules" (of which mostly end up INCREASING inefficiencies, or destroying potential buyers and sellers/pricing ppl out of markets, altering demand and supply forces to give THEMSELVES greater market share or creation of credits or exemptions for favored businesses... all that bad stuff)
I like being able to show it in equations and inequalities or on a statistical grid because it enables us to prove their misdeeds out in a different way. For those of us with more calculation oriented brains and learning styles it helps as well -- and leaves less to words and those type of explanations which are more easily falsified ( Reduce Inflation Act by increases in government spending, offset with pipeline deregulation, show us net effects) This is the reason behind so much decision making in the world of economic activity. They are all ultimately bound to their CBA cost benefit ratios and everything - even the wokeism - must benefit them financially in order for them to be engaging in that policy. They also I believe due deep research into household budgets and social psychology factors and newer fields like Dan Ariely with neuroenocomics to know just how hard to squeeze the American taxpayer system, where and when. Things that have extremely inelastic demand - gasoline for example, you have to buy it regardless of consumer tastes - is where they tend to pull a lot of bullshit like this. No doubt also that inflation is a tax - you're paying for them somewhere down the line with it - and they are in very good recognizance of just how much you'll be able to take when they push out these Bill's and regulatory strategies. Its really no different than a corporation finding product value and its needs on supply side and matching to potential market size, consumer preferences, and demand stimulus and utilization. Always ends up an optimization equation. But they are the government or the controlling crony power so the unfair advantages are the writing of the rules of market while ALSO being a participant in it!
Well anyhow sorry I took this way too far and wrote about absolutely nothing important! Sorry! But Congratulations and thank you for sharing sir! Godspeed to you.
I appreciate all the modeling. I do some in my work, but the problem is actually both more insidious, and easier to show and understand. The reason people don't see the problem isn't because it's complicated, or requires math to be definitive, it's because they have been trained not to look.
That is why I began with the media. I don't really get into media fuckery until the end (and some scattered throughout the report), but I needed to plant a reasonable doubt into the minds of the readers, just enough to get them to look at the evidence I present.
The fuckery is so great, it is immediately discredited by the individuals mind because it can't be true, because if it were true, everyone would already know.
First I show the construction of the Single Corporate Machine, and how it evolved into today (which is what section 5 is, and all I have out so far). Then I get into the really good stuff (section 6 will come out soon).
There is no such thing as competition in the Market. Not because of "regulations" etc. I mean, everything you said I agree with, but that's not the fuckery. That's just the dials and switches they use to run the machine. The Machine is the fuckery, and no one sees it. I am showing it, by showing how it was built.
That's going to cause a few heads to explode, but really, section 6 is when I start blowing up brains. I can't wait to finish... It's so close!