Science is not something you Trust, until it has been rigorously Tested and PROVEN to be Unquestionably accurate !! 🤔
(media.greatawakening.win)
✅ - TRUTH - ✅
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
Comments (19)
sorted by:
Science is never settled and remember, scientists are people. They can lie, cheat and make mistakes just like the rest of us.
Look up the first people who tried to repeat Millikan's electron charge experiment. They got different answers from Millikan so they massaged their data. They would remove data they deemed to be outliers etc. Eventually, it was discovered that Millikan had the wrong answer himself! Those scientists who first repeated his experiment should have stuck to their guns and presented their actual data. It was probably correct. Richard Feynman thought that was a scientific low point.
Then there was Mendel who did some pioneering work on genetics with pea plants before anyone was really interested. He could not quite get the data he needed to prove his inheritance theory so he manipulated the data to make it "come right". It turns out his guess WAS right but he should really have gone with the actual data.
Then there was Eddington who tried to confirm Einstein's gravitational lensing effect. He got an answer somewhere between the Newton result and the Einstein result. He decided to choose Einstein even though he did not have the data.
Recently, we have had the hydroxychloroquine (HCQ) papers. They showed HCQ to be ineffective. It works like a gun - you still need ammunition, in this case zinc. So, people said you need zinc so they tested zinc. Same result: ineffective. They were told, no, you need both HCQ and zinc - just like you need a gun and ammunition.
So they tried that but again ineffective. When the papers were examined they found that the the medications were applied too late - like issuing the guns and ammo after the burglars have left and gone home! They were told that the medication needed to be applied early so they tried that and still reported: ineffective. Examining what they did it was discovered that they overdosed people on HCQ.
MSM loved it, of course, they had four papers showing that HCQ and zinc were ineffective. It was only if you took time to delve into the science papers that you could see how they distorted the results.
About 10 years ago, my sister was studying to get her master's in chemistry at Clemson.
A classmate was going on vacation and asked my sister to run their experiment for them for the week. After inputting data into the equation, sis realized the equation was useless. The multiplier in the equation was essentially 1, so the answers meant nothing. She showed the professor. He said, don't worry about it, keep running the experiment. He was getting paid by government grant to produce results... it didn't matter to him how they got the results.
That is one department in one college in one state in one country. It's terrifying to think how much other corrupted information is being created and used, all for a paycheck.
That experience of hers was an information seed planted in my brain, luckily. That caused me to start questioning the science. My sister however, probably works like her professor did.