Who owns the Thomsons?

Found this :

«If you believe this, then you clearly don’t have a desire to dig deeper into majority shareholder ownership and the quorum that is achieved through private acquisitions and even publicly traded companies like Thomson Corporation. Thomson Reuters operated under a dual-listed structure and had two parent companies, both of which were publicly listed — Thomson Reuters Corporation and Thomson Reuters plc.

For instance, Paul Julius Reuters was working directly with Rothschild going all the way back to 1850!

https://www.rothschildarchive.org/collections/treasure_of_the_month/february_2019_telegraphic_code_books_south_american_business_1909_1938

There’s even many who said Rothschild was an early investor in Reuters (a private company who does not need to list shareholders) which led to Rothschild controlling interest in the Bank of England. Even if Rothschild didn’t purchase

Ironically, Associated Press was started in 1846 by Moses Yale Beach to consolidate telegraph costs for his Boston and NY Papers (again, privately owned so you will not have privileged information as to full share ownership distribution). His cousin? ELIHU YALE who was President of the British East India Company settlement in Fort St. George, at Madras. He is best remembered as the primary benefactor of Yale College, which was named in his honor. Skull and Bones, on and on. Let’s leave that fraternal order aside and discuss the direct connection to British East India Company and Nathan Rothschild: https://www.rothschildarchive.org/collections/treasure_of_the_month/december_2017_east_india_company_stock_list_1815 . Rothschild understood clearly the benefits of controlling the distribution of information: https://fr.wikipedia.org/wiki/Histoire_des_agences_de_presse (switch to English translation) “Ouvrard launches into a financial battle on the London Stock Exchange. He speculated on the decline in French government bonds, while Nathan Rothschild , on the contrary, played on the rise 66.” In 2011 Sir Evelyn de Rothschild gave a talk at Peking University at which he said (@7:20):

[Talking about his families banking empire] We covered Europe. We covered the European Union that we have today. From that grew a business which was successfully built upon an understanding between the five brothers. The five brothers used to talk to each other through writing. That was one side. They were also the first client of a man called Mr. Reuter. Mr. Reuter made his name by flying pigeons around the world, and if you couldn’t send messages, you used a pigeon. And that’s why we were the first client of the great house of Reuter. Which as you know became the most important messaging company in the world today. And from that it grew, over a period of time.

There is also a plaque in front of Royal Exchange London which is a commemoration to Edmond L'de Rothschild. It says:

The supply of information to the world’s traders in securities, commodities and currencies was then, as is now the mainspring of Reuters activities & the guarantee of the founder’s aims of accuracy, rapidity and reliability. News services based on those principles now go to news papers, radio & television networks & governments throughout the world. Reuters has faithfully continued the work begun here to attest this & to honour Paluullius Reuter. The memorial was set here by Reuters to Mark the 125th anniversary of Reuters foundation & inaugurated by Edmond L’de Rothschild td 13-10-76

For decades the media has fallen under the ownership of a few corporations who through their editorial control have created a socially engineered construct which represents a fabricated version of reality. In order to maintain this artificial illusion the media exercises a program of censorship of all news and events of importance and replaces the truth with lies, distortion, distraction and omission. The media thereby create a false version of reality in order to keep the public compliant and controlled. To say that Rothschild was not invested at all in British East India Company or Associated Press or Reuters would be disingenuous and naïve.»