What has been your favorite rabbit hole to explore since you’ve awoken? Looking for ideas and also genuinely curious!
🗣️ DISCUSSION 💬
I’m genuinely curious what interesting rabbit holes have been explored by other anons and which ones still keep you going back for more.
Actually no that's not what I mean by that. It's frustrating that literally every single person who tries to debunk Fomenko always starts "I haven't actually read any of his trash, but..." like, his work is so in depth, nuanced and utterly thrilling, and unveils a completely alternative chronological paradigm, that it's impossible to critique unless you take the time to take him seriously first.
Heck, I almost want to spend a year debunking it simply because I don't WANT it to be true.
If he's right, were in the 9th century ad right now. The shroud of Turin is indeed Christ and is indeed from the supposed 12th century, because he makes a damn strong case that Christ happened about 800 years ago.
Google Fomenko pdf and you can get most of his translations free. Also, Fomenko archive to get the first four major works in his History Fiction or Science series
Wait, is that what I said? Is that even remotely close to what I said?
Is that even on the same fucking continent to what I said?
If you're going to start complaining, at least pretend to have heard what someone said before climbing a wall so that when you jump off with a sword in your hands you will have more force to cut someone's head off.
Seriously, if you want to communicate you need to listen to what someone actually says.
I said it was interesting. If I thought it was in any way important (whether or not it was true) I would look into it. Maybe at some point I will and I appreciate you bringing it to my attention because when I said "it looks interesting," I meant it.
At the moment however, I have much bigger fish to fry. Yes, bigger than a potentially missing thousand years.
Bro. You're taking this rather personally. I'm not saying YOU said it. I'm just used to bringing him up and having the person dismiss it blindly. Chill.
It's not that I'm taking it "personally," I didn't feel it was personal at all. The rhetoric of your response suggested (to me) that you misunderstood me. It also sounded a whole lot like an attack based on that misunderstanding.
Perhaps the misunderstanding was mine, but I suggest you choose your rhetoric more carefully to avoid such misunderstandings. I am not often prone to misreading someones intentions like that.
I do not dismiss any evidence blindly. I can't possibly present a counter argument to someone if I haven't heard their argument.
At some point I will probably look into the stuff you have suggested. At that point I will see the evidence. Atm I am disinclined to believe it based on my own investigations which are quite extensive, but it is intriguing and worth looking into. Again, thank you for bringing it to my attention. I mean that sincerely.