Thanks for being up front about your attitude towards Flynn.
Personally, I'm solidly in the Flynn is an uber-patriot camp, but that said, I think there is a somewhat unhealthy trend among some truth seekers to idolize patriots, 'celebrity' names, as if they are perfect. Almost like a hangover from the Cabal "celebrity culture".
In my view, there are basically Two large camps: there are those who are moving in and contributing God's direction, and those who are moving in and contributing to Satan's direction. Then, there are those who are mid-way, who are unaware and uncommitted at all.
In the two camps, however, there is a very wide spectrum ranging from some who are full pelt in the camp's direction and completely playing a key pivotal role, and some who are barely doing much, but are in the camp because they are aligned with the overall direction.
No one in either camp is perfectly good or perfectly evil.
From that perspective, I hold the conviction that someone can be flawed, or hold certain off-base views, but still be contributing to the overall goal, and be a positive force.
I think some people let smaller issues and less key (core) issues determine what they how they judge and evaluate patriots, for example, instead of recognizing what the overall contribution is, and that flawed people are everywhere, but that Good still works through flawed people.
Thanks for being up front about your attitude towards Flynn.
Personally, I'm solidly in the Flynn is an uber-patriot camp, but that said, I think there is a somewhat unhealthy trend among some truth seekers to idolize patriots, 'celebrity' names, as if they are perfect. Almost like a hangover from the Cabal "celebrity culture".
In my view, there are basically Two large camps: there are those who are moving in and contributing God's direction, and those who are moving in and contributing to Satan's direction. Then, there are those who are mid-way, who are unaware and uncommitted at all.
In the two camps, however, there is a very wide spectrum ranging from some who are full pelt in the camp's direction and completely playing a key pivotal role, and some who are barely doing much, but are in the camp because they are aligned with the overall direction.
No one in either camp is perfectly good or perfectly evil.
From that perspective, I hold the conviction that someone can be flawed, or hold certain off-base views, but still be contributing to the overall goal, and be a positive force.
I think some people let smaller issues and less key (core) issues determine what they how they judge and evaluate patriots, for example, instead of recognizing what the overall contribution is, and that flawed people are everywhere, but that Good still works through flawed people.