I worry they planted evidence like child porn or something.
I'm as technically gifted as a giant anteater. That said, other anons may be able to corroborate the info that I read a couple years ago: certain highly skilled IT people can detect and discern, with a high degree of certainty, files that were planted from ones that weren't planted.
A 'tech lie' designed to fool the public won't work.
(Kind of similar to high-I.Q. individuals figuring out the "Russians hacked the DNC server" story was a lie. Wikileaks could not have received the DNC server contents via email from the "Russians" or anyone else, because the transfer rate was determined to be 25 times the maximum possible speed via the internet. Seth Rich instead had to have provided Julian the data via thumb drive or some similar media, which got Seth murdered in the dead of night by govt agents working for the Clintons.)
I'm as technically gifted as a giant anteater. That said, other anons may be able to corroborate the info that I read a couple years ago: certain highly skilled IT people can detect and discern, with a high degree of certainty, files that were planted from ones that weren't planted.
A 'tech lie' designed to fool the public won't work.
(Kind of similar to high-I.Q. individuals figuring out the "Russians hacked the DNC server" story was a lie. Wikileaks could not have received the DNC server contents via email from the "Russians" or anyone else, because the transfer rate was determined to be 25 times the maximum possible speed via the internet. Seth Rich instead had to have provided Julian the data via thumb drive or some similar media, which got Seth murdered in the dead of night by govt agents working for the Clintons.)