We are researchers who deal in open-source information, reasoned argument, and dank memes. We do battle in the sphere of ideas and ideas only. We neither need nor condone the use of force in our work here.
So let’s have a reasoned argument. Is it reasonable to believe that the men and women who orchestrated the raid of Mar a Lago are going to stop behaving poorly when it comes to your fundamental rights? And if that’s not reasonable, is it reasonable to consider the fact that you will have to decide how to respond? And is it reasonable to conclude that if you’re not willing to use force, you might end up fighting a war of ideas from a work camp?
We are researchers who deal in open-source information, reasoned argument, and dank memes. We do battle in the sphere of ideas and ideas only. We neither need nor condone the use of force in our work here.
So let’s have a reasoned argument. Is it reasonable to believe that the men and women who orchestrated the raid of Mar a Lago are going to stop behaving poorly when it comes to your fundamental rights? And if that’s not reasonable, is it reasonable to consider the fact that you will have to decide how to respond? And is it reasonable to conclude that if you’re not willing to use force, you might end up fighting a war of ideas from a work camp?