POTUS is 100% insulated - any discussion suggesting he’s even a target is false.
.
.
POTUS will not be addressing nation on any of these issues as people begin to be indicted and must remain neutral for pure optical reasons.
.
.
Focus on Military Intellingence/ State Secrets and why might that be used vs any three letter agency
.
.
Whate SC decision opened the door for a sitting President to activate - what must be showed?
”In Domestic Security Act (DSA) 6. U.S.C. §466 (2002) Congress further established that "Sense of Congress reaffirming the continued importance and applicability of the Posse Comitatus Act." §466(a)(1) provides "Posse Comitatus Act prohibits the use of any part of the Armed Forces as a posse comitatus to execute the laws," and (a)(4) and (5) provides: the exceptional circumstances are "when the use of the Armed Forces is authorized by Act of Congress or the President determines that the use of the Armed Forces is required to fulfill the President's obligation under the Constitution to respond promptly in time of war, insurrection, or other serious emergency" such as " an attack against the Nation using weapons of mass destruction." §466(b)” - Page 26-27 in link SC ruling from link below. 👇
https://www.supremecourt.gov/DocketPDF/18/18-5766/60675/20180824153156078_00000002.pdf
Why is POTUS surrounded by generals 👆🏼👆👆🏾
Don’t fool yourself into thinking Obama, Soros, Roth’s, Clinton’s etc have more power present day than POTUS.
Patriots are in control. Sit back and enjoy the show.
.
.
After the Constitution was ratified, Congress assembled and began exercising its legislative authority and began to permit the domestic use of the military. First, Congress authorized the President to call the militia to protect the frontier from “hostile incursions of the Indians.”31 Next, Congress enabled the militias to respond to invasion, insurrec- tion, and obstruction of the laws.32 These acts permitted the President to call forth the militia for a limited time, when “the laws of the United States shall be opposed, or the execution thereof obstructed . . .”33 The President had authority to act only after he issued a proclamation commanding the “insurgents” to disperse.34
https://digitalcommons.wcl.american.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1099&context=nslb
So, if I'm understanding this correctly, inre your highlighted section, the beasts would be trying to use the "enforce federal authority" part of that (with respect to alleged records-keeping procedures), but still it would need to be authorized by either Congress or the Potatus (the resident acting as the President), neither of which, to the best of our knowledge, occurred.
Edit: I have no idea what 10 U.S.C. Sections 251-255 cover.
Edit2: And in any case, it appears they've grossly overstepped their bounds by not involving state authorities and relegating themselves to a support role. In the Dong case he had to appeal all the way up to the SC. My guess is they'll toss Garland (or whoever signed off on this M-A-L raid) under the bus as they did the "rogue DCIS agent" in the Dong case.
This is in reference to Trump having the power to call for MI due to insurrection and a coup to steal the presidential election. I think you were mentioning the recent raid
However I do think the recent raid does connect with the state secrets and FBI/DOJ vs MI
Yes, I was - sorry about that. When I read/scanned the Dong case document you provided inre federal overreach, I thought you were pointing to the M-A-L incident. Tangled web here. I'll have to read this through again from a different perspective, so to speak. Legalese is not my field at all so I have to read it s-l-o-w-l-y and repeatedly.
Thank you so much for your clarification(s).