The answer is no.
The Steve Kirsch debate about the existence of the virus
Opening statement from Rappoport
Let me be clear. I’m speaking for myself here, as a reporter who says SARS-CoV-2 doesn’t exist. I’m not speaking for Andrew Kaufman, Stefan Lanka, Tom Cowan, Christine Massey, Sam Bailey, or anyone else who has come to the same conclusion.
OK. Steve Kirsch frames the debate (see also here) this way: There are a set of facts about COVID you can lay on the table. Then you decide which hypothesis best explains those facts.
In his case, he chooses: “SARS-CoV-2 exists.”
This approach is an elementary mistake.
I’m not challenging any hypothesis. I’m ATTACKING A STRAIGHT-OUT LABORATORY PROCEDURE.
This is the #1 red pill right now, and most even here at GAW are too fucking lazy to research for themselves.
But I have found that some normies are willing to take a look. Over time, it will become well-understood. Until then, everyone else is following fake science.
It does take some time and thought to understand and overcome the f?^ckery delivered by the so called scientists who make the claim that SARS-CoV-2 exists and has been isolated.
I believe Jon Rappoport's articles bring clarity of truth.
SARS-CoV-2 has not been isolated nor proven to exist.
Virology in general is a lie. Virologist lie when they try to convince you it's a science. It's not a science by definition: https://viroliegy.com/2022/04/26/introduction-to-viroliegy/
So the patent number of the virus led me here 2015 but not cov 2