GOOOOOOoooooo RUMBLE ! CFVI
(media.greatawakening.win)
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
Comments (20)
sorted by:
what does the cf stand for in cfvi?
Cantor Fitzgerald. A part of Megacorp. It is impossible to introduce a SPAC without such an entity. It is, as of this time, impossible to have a public stock offering without using Megacorp. There is nothing suspicious here, beyond of course the entire state of fuckery in the stock market (see second link).
is cantor of cantor fitzsgerald still running that company? my understanding is he is quite liberal. also, he was the guy that was driving to work on 9/11 late because he took his kid to school and watched most of his employees perish in the towers. he is not too keen on the 9/11 conspiracy stuff. you can have a different opinion, but remember where you heard it when rumble starts censoring content.
All of that stuff is irrelevant. It is impossible to introduce a company into the Stock Market without using an agency just like this one. Read the second link above. It is very long, but it shows how intimately linked everything is. There is only one corporation in the world. It doesn't matter which door you use, they all enter the same company.
If they used CF, or BlackRock, or ANYONE to run their SPAC (not that BR does that, just saying), it wouldn't matter. They are all the same entity. Megacorp can't be escaped. Until we create a new system, you do what you can with what you have.
Rumble will censor content if the Board of Directors of Rumble want to censor content. That is where the power lies. If they are protected, then they will do what they want. If they are not protected (by the military etc.) then they will almost certainly be influenced by the Cabal. It doesn't matter what ties the company has, it only matters who the Board of Directors are, and whether they have protection from the Cabal.
If the statement of "strings cut" is true, then the Cabal can't influence them (in their normal way), and it is up to the Board of Directors. No one else is relevant.
right, who runs the board after this deal? we both know it wont be rumble making it's own decisions. by your own words you admit rumble is doomed to lose control of its own decisions. while the only difference in argument really is that you say they really have no choice. I agree with that, so there is no arguing there. so with that, where am I wrong in what I pointed out? what is your point then? I stand by my comment.