AM I WRONG FOR FEELING A LITTLE UNEASY WITH THIS NEW SPACE FORCE LOGO?
(media.greatawakening.win)
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
Comments (252)
sorted by:
Hardly.
Agnostic Deist
Thomas Paine and Ethan Allen.
Didn't claim the bible was false but didn't call themselves Christians although they partook in many Christian traditions.
Deist Christians
George Washington, Thomas Jefferson, John Adams, Benjamin Franklin, and James Monroe.
Attended church regularly but had individualist views about the veracity of the Bible and miracles told within but held steadfast to their Christian world views.
Practicing Christians
Sam Adams, Patrick Henry, and Jon Jay.
Believed in the divinity of Christ and the bible.
In order to keep the appearance of bias out of the constitution and void of an endorsement to a religion they intentionally kept God out of its text but for a single and very telling mention. This mention, while subtle speaks volumes to their beliefs. Closing paragraph below.
"done in Convention by the Unanimous Consent of the States present the Seventeenth Day of September in the Year of our Lord one thousand seven hundred and Eighty seven and of the Independance of the United States of America the Twelfth In witness whereof We have hereunto subscribed our Names,
G°. Washington Presidt and deputy from Virginia"
Were some masons? Yes. Was Freemasonry in its infancy at that point in time? Yes. Was it then as corrupt and demonic as it later came to be? Likely not but no real way to know.
But we certainly can't say they were by majority deist.
Many governments around the world model themselves from others. In part to keep some traditional but also in an effort to refine what they may have thought was a good form of government. Ours was not different in that regard.
It is apparent that the founding fathers were inspired by ancient Rome's representative republic form of governing. Like ancient Rome we also have a Senate where delegates rule on behalf of the people. And as such the founding fathers modeled much of the architecture of federal buildings much in the same way Rome did.
Where Rome's form of governing and the United States differ is in its principles of governing. The foundational values and ideals that would inspire law that said senate would put fourth, at their root, are much different. The founding fathers were inspired by ancient Rome's governing structure but built laws around a Judeo-Christian foundation.
Much of what I have just mentioned is not a mystery. It was discussed in great detail within the federalist papers which chipped away and refined their arguments that they would later use to finalize the constitution.
In regard to Fremasonry. This cult is but a front that cloaks its true intent. In fact the secrecy by which they operate and their true intent is not even known by the majority of masons. A mason is not given true insight into the intentions of this cult until he reaches the 32nd degree and is only fully informed at the 33rd. This practice is completely intentional and serves to weed out those that may betray them and only promotes true "believers" forward. Its of course much too late at that degree and once that level has been reached it is all but impossible to reject that doctrine. Again Freemasonry is simply the palatable front group for the public. We should refer to the driving force behind Freemasonry rather than speaking of Freemasons with any degree of importance. They are insignificant, they are but a dirty rag for use by its master. They should be referred to as their true name, a demonic acolyte.