If it pleases you, may I follow up briefly upon my previous post concerning Phil Godlewski?
Previously, I said that he absolutely has a source. He has a source, but the source may use him as a "voice" for disinformation or accurate information or some combination of the two. And I'm not sure whether Phil, himself, knows. But he has a source.
My previous post concerning Phil was here: https://greatawakening.win/p/15JAXfN1lL/phil-godlewski--some-reflections/
The post is long. Probably the most casually interesting aspect of that post is that in one particular video, Phil accidentally directly addresses his handler. Read my previous post for details.
For further consideration, I ask you to listen to the follow video at 31:56. https://rumble.com/v16weeu-current-events-may-31st-2022.html
In this video, on May 31, Phil asserts that Paul Pelosi was in fact arrested for child pornography. That may prove to be incorrect. That said, we have just recently learned that Mr. Pelosi had an undisclosed passenger in the car with him at the time of the crash. And Trump's attorney has suggested it was a child. ...And Phil was connecting this arrest with some sort of sexual incident involving a child on May 31. Bottom line: there's a source. Things may be a little garbled. The source may introduce disinformation along with information along with nearly-correct information. But there's a source.
Before you tell me everything he gets wrong, let me ask you to perform a mental exercise. Assume I tell you that I have a "source" that lets me know the lottery numbers ahead of time. Further assume that I am wrong 97% of the time. But that I am correct 3% of the time. You could dwell on the 97%. But the thing is this. I could not be right 3% of the time without a source. At a 3% hit rate, I'd be winning once per month. and would track to being the wealthiest man on earth. The only way to do that is with the aid of a source.
The bottom line is that if a person accomplishes something that there is no way to accomplish with an outside factor, then there is an outside factor. Irrespective of whether the person is a good person, a classy person, whether you like what the person sells, whether the person has a "past," or any other thing you might think of, there is an outside factor at play. That's where we are with Phil.
No, HERE is where we are with Phil:
I'm going to pretend you're not Phil, because Phil is running damage control majorly right now and given his typical "switch accounts and spread good publicity" schtick it's likely that you could be him.
How did a man that went to jail for check fraud (thus, he had no money) get out of jail and within literally a single year earn enough money for: a house in PA, an apartment near/in Vegas, a custom house being built on Lake Havasu, a Tesla, an Escalade, a large boat, and a large engagement ring all on top of nonstop flights back and forth from Vegas, Arizona, and Pennsylvania?
There's so much more but this message is already long. Check out one of the many groups on TG calling out Phil for an all access pass to irrefutable proof that Phil is a fraud.
#Philhateshispenis
Sorry - I just committed one of the worst mortal sins: I posted and went to bed!
I have noted much of what you've said.
My post is not about whether you should LIKE or TRUST Phil. It is about whether he has a source. Whether there is someone behind him
Is he a registered Democrat - with a source?
Is he a guy who unscrupulously sells Trump Bucks - but has a source?
Is he a guy who is lying about his past - but has a source?
Is he a guy who runs ad publicizing himself - but has a source?
And so on.
None of those things get at the issue of whether he has a source. They get to other issues that relate to his character. He can have poor character, and still have a source.
If he lies about 95% of the other crap that spews out of his mouth, why would you not think he lies about having a source?
Phil has said dozens of things that never came true, like countless dates for EBS, Trump’s return, NESARA’s start, and so on. Hell, just recently his source told him that GESARA is complete and has started, which brings about the end of all global conflict.
Then not even a week later there was an uptick in activity in The ME as well as In Russia v Ukraine and all the stuff happening with China.
Phil’s source also said that the Queen’s death announcement was “imminent”. That was close to the beginning of this year and multiple other times.
Phil’s source also said that during Phil’s January 7k Metals trip to Cancun that all of the police activity on the beaches was because the Mexican cartel had just been shut down. Just a few weeks ago we had news involving the cartel, soooo…
If Phil ever did have a legit source (he didn’t, unless you count his own butthole), he would’ve been dropped so fast. Both for his lack of professionalism, his nonstop aggression towards his own followers and naysayers, his bogus claims of being Q/Snowden, and for spilling the info in the first place.
Go take a look at what Phil spends his time doing these days. He’s throwing around laws he doesn’t understand to harass an artist that drew fan art of him which he then stole and started pasting all over merch without permission.
I hope you are not in ned of medical healing or any other variety of healing that suggests you're not in a "good place" right now. Let me know (all of us?) if prayer is wanted - you'll get it. ...Where two or more are gathered...
Anyhow, I have plenty of bases to know that Phil has a source. You'd need to read what I wrote.
Keep in mind that having a source does not mean: (1) being correct all the time; (2) being a voice of truth, as opposed to disinformation - it just means being a "voice" for someone else who wants to use your voice; (3) being a good person; (4) being honest; (5) being lawful; (6) being possessed of any particular virtue; (7) being substantially free of fault. And so on. It merely means you have a source. And that the source occasionally tells you what to say. I think many jump to the conclusion that having a source means being in possession of 100% indisputable truth. It doesn't. It just means you have a source.
I get what you’re saying but it’s been proven countless times that the vast majority of info that he puts out has been stolen from others. Sometimes it’s truthers and sometimes it’s wild theories his own followers Have come up with. He just admitted this yesterday in Cold Beer Confessional’s TG chat.
I do think it’s possible that Phil had been paid to spread misery throughout the movement but I don’t think anyone is feeding him any kind of information to spread. I think he’s just got one gigantic ego and gets off on all of the attention and especially the money he’s earning from his endless grifting.
He exhibits all traits of a classic narcissist, including deflecting blame onto his followers.
As far as needing prayers, I’m good, thank you. I appreciate the sentiment but plenty of people have prayed for me already. Things are hard here as they are on everyone. Let’s just all pray we get through this as soon as possible so we can start to live the lives we were meant to. :)