It's over. Feds used Dennis Montgomery's technology to hijack the election.
(media.greatawakening.win)
💥 B O O O O O M 💥
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
Comments (176)
sorted by:
Saucey sauce?
Maybe I'm missing something - I'm not looking at the Lindell event and have no knowledge of where this comes from.
From a text analysis viewpoint, this text reads likes its been written by a highschool dropout who never learned to use English technically or professionally. If it is legit (and everyone else commenting knows where it's from) then all I can say is, this guy cannot write for the life of him.
Without knowsing sauce or context, and having only the text itself, I'd say it would be virtually impossible for a professional with any moderate level of expertise or education (such as who might actually work on such programs) to write this way.
"....and discussed ..... domestic surveillance programs I worked in including election tampering and the abuses of .... who directed and supervised this illegal domestic surveillance programs I worked in, first in ...
<facepalm>
and discussed ..... domestic surveillance programs I worked ON including election tampering and abuses COMMITTED BY .... who directed and supervised THOSE programs.
"this programs"? ROFL.
"I presented information to him to support the claims I was making in my previous whistleblower complaints. I was seeking immunity to allow me to present my evidence of these super-secret surveillance programs I worked in."
I presented him with information in support of the claims I had made in previous whistleblower complaints.
super-secret? Not super-dooper-secret?
"....programs I worked in" is written (or spoken) FOUR times: completely redundant!!!
"us gov"? Not US gov?
If this is evidence verified and presented, then it only means the author cannot write shit or talk in any sort of professional capacity. But on its own, this level of crap writing would be powerful circumstantial evidence that it's all bulldust, written by a larper or fraud.
If anyone can verify or indicate sauce... please do!
Get over yourself.
hahahaha. Name checks out!
But ok, I'll get over the 7 years of tertiary-level studies and decades of training and experience in linguistics and text analysis that I have. Sorry I dared to speak up. Can you recommend a cave you think i should crawl back into, oh Wonderous One?
But maybe I'm not the one who needs to get over themselves...
Here: maybe this might help you to help me to get over myself?
https://www.scientific-editing.info/blog/what-is-textual-analysis/
As someone who is bad@grammar, I would like to sincerely thank you for being a fearless, and outspoken word-fag. I truly appreciate it. It's a shame that your kind gets treated so unfairly on the internet. Don't stop being you, fren.
Thanks Toxic. Thanks for the encouraging words, fren.
Perhaps some pedes are unable to distinguish between being a grammarnazee on one hand, and being a language analyst on the other.
There's nothing really wrong with being bad at grammar. Ultimately, the question is, am I able to articulate and communicate my thoughts, ideas, emotions, intentions, effectively. If that's accomplished, bad grammar, etc, linguistic 'rules', are not that relevant.
However, HOW a person uses language and what kind of dialects, habits, grammar, etc they use does reveal information that can be used to good effect, both to (sometimes) help improve effectiveness of communication, or, as in this case, to identify questions about the author.
The text here reads like some larp on 4chan wrote this up. That's all I'm saying. So, without ANY sauce reference or context provided by the OP, I'm wondering what's going on here.
Edit: I frequently enter typos when posting on GAW. Heaps.
Thanks for proving my statement.
You're welcome. Anything I can do to help your self-esteem.